Abstract
【Objective】 The study is to improve orchard's soil fertility and fruit quality.【Method】 The method of localizing soil amendment was utilized to study the effect of peat and chicken manure combination(C1P0:chicken manure 50 kg;C2P0:chicken manure 100 kg;C1P1:chicken manure 50 kg+peat 10 kg;C2P1:chicken manure 100 kg+peat 10 kg;C1P2:chicken manure 50 kg+peat 20 kg;CK:farm manure 50 kg.) on soil property,root distribution and fruit quality of Yanfeng NO.1 peach tree.【Result】 The results showed that bulk density and porosity in 20-40 cm soil layers were significantly reduced and increased by applying combination of chicken manure and peat,and the influence sequence of different treatments were C1P2C2P1C1P1C2P0C1P0.The available P,Fe,Zn,B were enhanced 132.58%,77.62%,195.97%,152.33% in C1P2 than CK separately.The root biomass in 20-40 cm soil layers was significantly increased,and the total root biomass in C1P2 was increased 240.14% than CK.The fruit quality of C1P2 was the best,and TSS/TS was improved 33.08% than CK.【Conclusion】 The best treatment is an optimum scheme of combination chicken manure 50 kg with peat 20 kg for amending soil to increase roots quantity and improve fruit qualities of peach.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Combined chicken manure and peat significantly reduced bulk density in 20-40 cm soil.
- Taxon
- peach tree
Prunus persicat0 - Organ / stage
- 20-40 cm soil layerse0
- Treatment
- combination of chicken manure and peate0
- Outcome
- bulk densitye0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“bulk density and porosity in 20-40 cm soil layers were significantly reduced and increased by applying combination of chicken manure and peat”
t0“peach tree”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined chicken manure and peat significantly increased porosity in 20-40 cm soil.
- Taxon
- peach treePrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- combination of chicken manure and peate0
- Outcome
- porositye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- 20-40 cm soil layerse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“bulk density and porosity in 20-40 cm soil layers were significantly reduced and increased by applying combination of chicken manure and peat”
t0“peach tree”
Claim · model-written summary
The reported treatment influence ranked C1P2, C2P1, C1P1, C2P0, and C1P0.
- Taxon
- peach treePrunus persicat0
- Outcome
- influence sequence of different treatmentse0
- Qualifier
- C1P2C2P1C1P1C2P0C1P0e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the influence sequence of different treatments were C1P2C2P1C1P1C2P0C1P0”
t0“peach tree”
Claim · model-written summary
C1P2 increased available soil P by 132.58% relative to CK.
- Taxon
- peach treePrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- C1P2e0
- Outcome
- available Pe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 132.58%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The available P,Fe,Zn,B were enhanced 132.58%,77.62%,195.97%,152.33% in C1P2 than CK separately.”
e1“C1P2:chicken manure 50 kg+peat 20 kg;CK:farm manure 50 kg.”
t0“peach tree”
Claim · model-written summary
C1P2 increased available soil Fe by 77.62% relative to CK.
- Taxon
- peach treePrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- C1P2e0
- Outcome
- Fee0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 77.62%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The available P,Fe,Zn,B were enhanced 132.58%,77.62%,195.97%,152.33% in C1P2 than CK separately.”
t0“peach tree”
Claim · model-written summary
C1P2 increased available soil Zn by 195.97% relative to CK.
- Taxon
- peach treePrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- C1P2e0
- Outcome
- Zne0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 195.97%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The available P,Fe,Zn,B were enhanced 132.58%,77.62%,195.97%,152.33% in C1P2 than CK separately.”
t0“peach tree”
Claim · model-written summary
C1P2 increased available soil B by 152.33% relative to CK.
- Taxon
- peach treePrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- C1P2e0
- Outcome
- Be0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 152.33%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The available P,Fe,Zn,B were enhanced 132.58%,77.62%,195.97%,152.33% in C1P2 than CK separately.”
t0“peach tree”
Claim · model-written summary
Root biomass in the 20-40 cm soil layer increased significantly.
- Taxon
- peach treePrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- combination of chicken manure and peate1
- Outcome
- root biomasse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- 20-40 cm soil layerse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The root biomass in 20-40 cm soil layers was significantly increased”
t0“peach tree”
e1“applying combination of chicken manure and peat”
Claim · model-written summary
C1P2 increased total root biomass by 240.14% relative to CK.
- Taxon
- peach treePrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- C1P2e0
- Outcome
- total root biomasse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 240.14%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the total root biomass in C1P2 was increased 240.14% than CK.”
t0“peach tree”
Claim · model-written summary
C1P2 produced the best fruit quality among treatments.
- Taxon
- peach treePrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- C1P2e0
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fruit quality of C1P2 was the best”
t0“peach tree”
Claim · model-written summary
C1P2 improved fruit TSS/TS by 33.08% relative to CK.
- Taxon
- peach treePrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- C1P2e1
- Outcome
- TSS/TSe0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 33.08%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TSS/TS was improved 33.08% than CK.”
e1“fruit quality of C1P2 was the best”
t0“peach tree”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend chicken manure 50 kg with peat 20 kg to improve peach roots and fruit quality.
- Taxon
- peach treePrunus persicat0
- Outcome
- combination chicken manure 50 kg with peat 20 kg for amending soil to increase roots quantity and improve fruit qualities of peache0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“an optimum scheme of combination chicken manure 50 kg with peat 20 kg for amending soil to increase roots quantity and improve fruit qualities of peach.”
t0“peach tree”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · soil: physics · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
growing medium · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →fertilization · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.