Paper · 2005 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effect of cadmium on photosynthesis parameters, leaf soluble sugar and plant growth in two rice cultivars

Jie Zhang; Yongchao Liang; Yunsheng Lou; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Contamination of the environment with toxic heavy metals due to anthropogenic activities is one of the major global environmental and human health problems.Cadmium severely inhibits plant growth and even causes plant death by disturbing the uptake of nutrients and inhibiting photosynthesis via degradation of chlorophyll.Two rice(Oryza sativa L.) cultivars: Wuyujing No.3,a Cd tolerant cultivar and Shanyou 63,a Cd susceptible cultivar,were grown hydroponically in this study to investigate the effects of Cd applied at realistic levels on photosynthetic parameters,soluble sugar and plant growth.Rice seedlings were grown in nutrient solutions with cadmium applied at the rate of Cd 0,1.0 or 5.0 (μmol/L).The results showed that the photosynthesis of the leaves was significantly inhibited under Cd stress.In comparison with the control,Cd treatment induced a decline in net photosynthetic rate(Pn),stomatal conductance(Gs),transpiration rate(Tr),stomatal limitation value(Ls) and transpiration efficiency(Te) in seedlings and this Cd-induced reduction was significantly dose-dependent. Cadmium treatment increased the concentration of soluble sugar significantly in both cultivars but decreased the content of leaf chlorophyll only in the susceptible cultivar at 5.0 Cd μmol/L.Shoot growth(length) was significantly reduced in the susceptible cultivar only at Cd 5.0 μmol/L,but root growth(length) was significantly inhibited at either Cd 1.0 or 5.0 μmol/L.In contrast,shoot and root growth(length) was unaffected in the tolerant cultivar compared to the control.These results suggested that there was significant genotypical difference in rice in response to Cd toxicity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the control, Cd treatment reduced net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in rice seedlings, significantly and dose-dependently.

Treatment
Cd treatmente0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate(Pn),stomatal conductance(Gs),transpiration rate(Tr)e0
Direction
declinee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison with the control,Cd treatment induced a decline in net photosynthetic rate(Pn),stomatal conductance(Gs),transpiration rate(Tr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the control, Cd treatment reduced stomatal limitation value and transpiration efficiency in rice seedlings, significantly and dose-dependently.

Treatment
Cd treatmente0
Outcome
stomatal limitation value(Ls) and transpiration efficiency(Te)e0
Direction
declinee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison with the control,Cd treatment induced a decline in net photosynthetic rate(Pn),stomatal conductance(Gs),transpiration rate(Tr),stomatal limitation value(Ls) and transpiration efficiency(Te)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium treatment significantly increased leaf soluble sugar concentration in both rice cultivars.

Treatment
Cadmium treatmente0
Outcome
concentration of soluble sugare0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium treatment increased the concentration of soluble sugar significantly in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd decreased leaf chlorophyll content only in the susceptible cultivar, at 5.0 Cd μmol/L.

Material
susceptible cultivare0
Treatment
5.0 Cd μmol/Le0
Outcome
content of leaf chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium treatment increased the concentration of soluble sugar significantly in both cultivars but decreased the content of leaf chlorophyll only in the susceptible cultivar at 5.0 Cd μmol/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot length was significantly reduced in the susceptible cultivar only at Cd 5.0 μmol/L.

Material
susceptible cultivare0
Treatment
Cd 5.0 μmol/Le0
Outcome
Shoot growth(length)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot growth(length) was significantly reduced in the susceptible cultivar only at Cd 5.0 μmol/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length was significantly inhibited at either Cd 1.0 or 5.0 μmol/L.

Treatment
Cd 1.0 or 5.0 μmol/Le0
Outcome
root growth(length)e0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root growth(length) was significantly inhibited at either Cd 1.0 or 5.0 μmol/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot and root length were unaffected in the tolerant cultivar compared with the control.

Material
tolerant cultivare0
Outcome
shoot and root growth(length)e0
Direction
unaffectede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot and root growth(length) was unaffected in the tolerant cultivar compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1565 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that rice shows significant genotypic differences in response to Cd toxicity.

Outcome
significant genotypical differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was significant genotypical difference in rice in response to Cd toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1674 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

92 papers: 17 positive, 75 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

cadmium atom · physiology: osmolytes · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cadmium atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 3 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

cadmium atom · physiology: gas exchange · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

cadmium atom · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

18 papers: 0 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.