Paper · 2014 · Northern Horticulture

Effect of Fruit Bag Color on Grape Quality in Facility Condition

Shang Jiayi

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taking ‘Red globe'grape as teat material,by different color of fruit bags for bagging treatments,with the treatment without fruit bagging as the control(CK),the effect of different color of fruit bag on the changes of temperature,light and fruit quality of grape in solar greenhouse were studied.The results showed that different colors of fruit bags were significantly increased the proportion of light spectrum,and reduced the light radiation,the intensity of illumination.Red fruit bag raised the temperature inside the bag.The total sugar content of blue bags,green bags and white bags had no significant difference with the control.Bagging treatments were significantly lower than the control on the content of total phenolic and proanthocyanidins.Thus,bagging affected grape color.Yellow bags and red bags had more negative effect on fruit quality of grape.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Colored bags increased the light spectrum proportion.

Taxon
fruit bagse0
Treatment
different colors of fruit bagse0
Outcome
proportion of light spectrume0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“different colors of fruit bags were significantly increased the proportion of light spectrum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colored bags reduced light radiation and illumination intensity.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
fruit bagse1
Outcome
light radiation,the intensity of illuminatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“reduced the light radiation,the intensity of illumination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–474 · show in text ↑
e1

“different colors of fruit bags were significantly increased the proportion of light spectrum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red bags raised the temperature inside the bag.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
Red fruit bage0
Outcome
temperature inside the bage0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Red fruit bag raised the temperature inside the bag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue bags did not differ significantly from control in total sugar.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
blue bagse0
Outcome
total sugar contente0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“The total sugar content of blue bags,green bags and white bags had no significant difference with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green bags did not differ significantly from control in total sugar.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
green bagse0
Outcome
total sugar contente0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“The total sugar content of blue bags,green bags and white bags had no significant difference with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

White bags did not differ significantly from control in total sugar.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
white bagse0
Outcome
total sugar contente0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“The total sugar content of blue bags,green bags and white bags had no significant difference with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging lowered total phenolic and proanthocyanidin content.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
Bagging treatmentse0
Outcome
content of total phenolic and proanthocyanidinse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bagging treatments were significantly lower than the control on the content of total phenolic and proanthocyanidins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging affected grape color.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
bagginge0
Outcome
grape colore0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“bagging affected grape color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow bags had a negative effect on grape fruit quality.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
Yellow bagse0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
negativee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow bags and red bags had more negative effect on fruit quality of grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red bags had a negative effect on grape fruit quality.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
red bagse0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
negativee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow bags and red bags had more negative effect on fruit quality of grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–862 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.