Abstract
The effects of different methods of transplanting with film mulching on flue-cured tobacco quality and yield and its root system were experimented in Shandong tobacco production area. The results showed that different methods of transplanting with film mulching significantly affected tobacco quality and yield and its roots system, the treatment (low ridge transplanting and hilling up twice after uncovering) is best, the treatment (low ridge transplanting and hilling up once after uncovering) is better, the root system of treatment (high ridge transplanting and no uncovering) is worst, the root system has close relation with tobacco quality and yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting and mulching methods significantly affected quality, yield and roots.
- Taxon
- tobacco
Nicotiana tabacume0e1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“different methods of transplanting with film mulching significantly affected tobacco quality and yield and its roots system”
e1“different methods of transplanting with film mulching significantly affected tobacco quality and yield and its roots system”
Claim · model-written summary
Low ridge transplanting and hilling twice was best.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume0e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment (low ridge transplanting and hilling up twice after uncovering) is best”
e1“different methods of transplanting with film mulching significantly affected tobacco quality and yield and its roots system”
Claim · model-written summary
Low ridge transplanting with one hilling was better.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume0e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment (low ridge transplanting and hilling up once after uncovering) is better”
e1“different methods of transplanting with film mulching significantly affected tobacco quality and yield and its roots system”
Claim · model-written summary
High ridge transplanting without uncovering produced the worst roots.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume0e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the root system of treatment (high ridge transplanting and no uncovering) is worst”
e1“different methods of transplanting with film mulching significantly affected tobacco quality and yield and its roots system”
Claim · model-written summary
Root system was closely related to tobacco quality and yield.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume0e1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the root system has close relation with tobacco quality and yield”
e1“different methods of transplanting with film mulching significantly affected tobacco quality and yield and its roots system”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
22 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.