Abstract
In order to highlight the unique style and improve the quality of tobacco leaves by give full play to the climatic resource advantages,two randomized block experiments were conducted to research the effects of transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco cultivar‘Yunyan 85'.The results showed that the appearance quality of tobacco leaves of early transplanting were better than that of control group leaves,especially in the middle leaves and upper leaves with orange color of uniform and plump,loose structure,mature feature,moderate identity,enough oil.On the contrary,the appearance quality of tobacco leaves of delaying transplanting were inferior to that of control group leaves.The full-bodied flavor and baking-sweet flavor of flue-cured tobacco leaves faded down,the fen-flavor and fen-sweet intensified,the aroma quality smelled better,the aroma quantity become more plentiful,the offensive odor smelled lighter,the smoking become more exquisite,the taste strength increased,the physiological strengthwas more moderate,the irritation decreased,the remaining taste tasted better,and the composite score of smoking quality increased with the transplanting date moved up in the local.The influence of transplanting date on the content of tobacco conventional chemical composition was not obvious.Analysis of variance indicated that there were significantly or extremely significantly difference among four transplanting date treatments in all smoking quality indexes,but there was no significantly difference in some chemical composition indexes such as nicotine,total sugar,reducing sugar,potassium and chlorine.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Early transplanting improved tobacco leaf appearance relative to control.
- Taxon
- tobacco
Nicotiana tabacume0 - Treatment
- early transplantinge0
- Outcome
- appearance qualitye0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- control group leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“appearance quality of tobacco leaves of early transplanting were better than that of control group leaves”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed transplanting worsened tobacco leaf appearance relative to control.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume0
- Treatment
- delaying transplantinge0
- Outcome
- appearance qualitye0
- Direction
- inferiore0
- Comparator
- control group leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“appearance quality of tobacco leaves of delaying transplanting were inferior to that of control group leaves”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Earlier transplanting reduced full-bodied and baking-sweet flavors.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume0
- Treatment
- transplanting datet1
- Outcome
- full-bodied flavor and baking-sweet flavore0
- Direction
- faded downe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The full-bodied flavor and baking-sweet flavor of flue-cured tobacco leaves faded down”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“transplanting date”
Claim · model-written summary
Earlier transplanting intensified fen-flavor and fen-sweet.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Treatment
- transplanting datet1
- Outcome
- fen-flavor and fen-sweete0
- Direction
- intensifiede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the fen-flavor and fen-sweet intensified”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Earlier transplanting improved aroma quality.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Treatment
- transplanting datet1
- Outcome
- aroma qualitye0
- Direction
- bettere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the aroma quality smelled better”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Earlier transplanting increased aroma quantity.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Treatment
- transplanting datet1
- Outcome
- aroma quantitye0
- Direction
- more plentifule0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the aroma quantity become more plentiful”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Earlier transplanting lightened offensive odor.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Treatment
- transplanting datet1
- Outcome
- offensive odore0
- Direction
- lightere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the offensive odor smelled lighter”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Earlier transplanting made smoking more exquisite.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Treatment
- transplanting datet1
- Outcome
- smokinge0
- Direction
- more exquisitee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the smoking become more exquisite”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Earlier transplanting increased taste strength.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Treatment
- transplanting datet1
- Outcome
- taste strengthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the taste strength increased”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Earlier transplanting made physiological strength more moderate.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Treatment
- transplanting datet1
- Outcome
- physiological strengthe0
- Direction
- more moderatee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the physiological strengthwas more moderate”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Earlier transplanting reduced irritation.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Treatment
- transplanting datet1
- Outcome
- irritatione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the irritation decreased”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Earlier transplanting improved remaining taste.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Treatment
- transplanting datet1
- Outcome
- remaining tastee0
- Direction
- bettere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the remaining taste tasted better”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Earlier transplanting increased the smoking quality composite score.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Treatment
- transplanting datee0
- Outcome
- composite score of smoking qualitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the composite score of smoking quality increased with the transplanting date moved up in the local.”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting date had no obvious influence on conventional chemical composition.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume0
- Treatment
- transplanting datee0
- Outcome
- content of tobacco conventional chemical compositione0
- Direction
- not obviouse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The influence of transplanting date on the content of tobacco conventional chemical composition was not obvious.”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
All smoking quality indexes differed significantly among four transplanting dates.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Treatment
- four transplanting date treatmentse0
- Outcome
- all smoking quality indexese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly or extremely significantly difference among four transplanting date treatments in all smoking quality indexes”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Nicotine, total sugar and reducing sugar did not differ significantly among transplanting dates.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Outcome
- nicotine,total sugar,reducing sugare0
- Direction
- no significantly differencee0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no significantly difference in some chemical composition indexes such as nicotine,total sugar,reducing sugar”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium and chlorine did not differ significantly among transplanting dates.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacumt1
- Outcome
- potassium and chlorinee0
- Direction
- no significantly differencee0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no significantly difference in some chemical composition indexes such as nicotine,total sugar,reducing sugar,potassium and chlorine.”
t1“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
t0“transplanting date on quality and unique style of flue-cured tobacco”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →transplanting · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.