Abstract
To improve quality and quantity of apple fruits, this study conducted in factorial experiment in randomized complete block design with 6 replications. Results showed that foliar application was applied only in the spring, the yield increased. The positive effect of foliar application in spring and fall on the yield increase was superior to the control, but highest yield was obtained in foliar application in the fall+spring. In spite of the increased yield through localized fertilization treatment and foliar application in the fall+spring no decrease was observed in fruit texture firmness. However, the specific weight of fruits and the TSS/TA ratio were increased. Because of the increased yield in fall+spring foliar application, the fruits diameter was decreased. The results showed that in order to avoid alternation and to increase the yield, the foliar application of nutrients will be effective in the spring, fall or both, especially for low yield gardens.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Spring foliar application increased apple yield.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- "Red Delicious"t0
- Treatment
- foliar application was applied only in the springe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“"Red Delicious" apple”
e0“foliar application was applied only in the spring, the yield increased.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined fall and spring foliar application increased yield over the control.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- foliar application in spring and falle0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“"Red Delicious" apple”
e0“The positive effect of foliar application in spring and fall on the yield increase was superior to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Fall plus spring foliar application produced the highest yield.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- foliar application in the fall+springe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“"Red Delicious" apple”
e0“highest yield was obtained in foliar application in the fall+spring”
Claim · model-written summary
Localized fertilization and fall plus spring foliar application increased yield without reducing fruit firmness.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- localized fertilization treatment and foliar application in the fall+springe0
- Outcome
- fruit texture firmnesse0
- Direction
- no decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“"Red Delicious" apple”
e0“In spite of the increased yield through localized fertilization treatment and foliar application in the fall+spring no decrease was observed in fruit texture firmness.”
Claim · model-written summary
The nutrient treatments increased fruit specific weight.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Outcome
- specific weight of fruitse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“"Red Delicious" apple”
e0“the specific weight of fruits and the TSS/TA ratio were increased.”
Claim · model-written summary
The nutrient treatments increased the fruit TSS/TA ratio.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Outcome
- TSS/TA ratioe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“"Red Delicious" apple”
e0“the specific weight of fruits and the TSS/TA ratio were increased.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fall plus spring foliar application decreased fruit diameter.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- fall+spring foliar applicatione0
- Outcome
- fruits diametere0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“"Red Delicious" apple”
e0“Because of the increased yield in fall+spring foliar application, the fruits diameter was decreased.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend spring, fall, or combined foliar nutrient application to avoid alternation and increase yield, especially in low-yield gardens.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Outcome
- foliar application of nutrients will be effective in the spring, fall or bothe0
- Qualifier
- especially for low yield gardense0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“"Red Delicious" apple”
e0“in order to avoid alternation and to increase the yield, the foliar application of nutrients will be effective in the spring, fall or both, especially for low yield gardens.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →application · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
70 papers more in this group
See all 74 papers →application · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
137 papers more in this group
See all 141 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.