Paper · 2011 · PubMed

Effect of climate change on infection of grapevine by downy and powdery mildew under controlled environment.

M Pugliese; M L Gullino; A Garibaldi

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant responses to elevated CO2 and temperature have been much studied in recent years, but effects of climate change on pathological responses are largerly unknown. The pathosystems grapevine (Vitis vinifera) - downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola) and powdery mildew (Erysiphe necatrix) were chosen as models to assess the potential impact of increased CO2 and temperature on disease incidence and severity under controlled environment. Grapevine potted plants were grown in phytotrons under 4 different simulated climatic conditions: (1) standard temperature (ranging from 18 degrees to 22 degrees C) and standard CO2 concentration (450 ppm); (2) standard temperature and elevated CO2 concentration (800 ppm); (3) elevated temperature (ranging from 22 degrees to 26 degrees C, 4 degrees C higher than standard) and standard CO2 concentration; (4) elevated temperature and CO2 concentration. Each plant was inoculated with a spore suspension containing 5x10(5) cfu/ml. Disease index and physiological parameters (chlorophyll content, fluorescence, assimilation rate) were assessed. Results showed an increase of the chlorophyll content with higher temperatures and CO2 concentration, to which consequently corresponded an higher fluorescence index. Disease incidence of downy mildew increased when both CO2 and temperatures were higher, while an increase in CO2 did not influenced powdery mildew incidence, probably due to the increased photosynthetic activity of plants under such conditions. Considering that the rising concentrations of CO2 and other greenhouse gases will lead to an increase in global temperature and longer seasons, we can assume that this will allow more time for pathogens evolution and could increase pathogen survival, indirectly affecting downy and powdery mildews of grapevine.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher temperature increased grapevine chlorophyll content.

Taxon
grapevineVitise2
Treatment
higher temperaturese0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
standard temperaturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase of the chlorophyll content with higher temperatures and CO2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1181 · show in text ↑
e1

“standard temperature (ranging from 18 degrees to 22 degrees C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–600 · show in text ↑
e2

“grapevine (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher CO2 increased grapevine chlorophyll content.

Taxon
grapevineVitise2
Treatment
CO2 concentratione0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
standard CO2 concentratione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase of the chlorophyll content with higher temperatures and CO2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1181 · show in text ↑
e1

“standard CO2 concentration (450 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–641 · show in text ↑
e2

“grapevine (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–209 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher temperature and CO2 conditions corresponded to a higher fluorescence index.

Taxon
grapevineVitise2
Treatment
higher temperatures and CO2 concentratione1
Outcome
fluorescence indexe0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to which consequently corresponded an higher fluorescence index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1246 · show in text ↑
e1

“with higher temperatures and CO2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1181 · show in text ↑
e2

“grapevine (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Downy mildew incidence increased when both CO2 and temperature were higher.

Taxon
grapevineVitise2
Treatment
both CO2 and temperatures were highere0
Interactor
Plasmopara viticolaPlasmopara viticolae2pathogen
Outcome
Disease incidence of downy mildewe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plasmopara viticola
Plasmopara viticola · InteractorRude · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease incidence of downy mildew increased when both CO2 and temperatures were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1334 · show in text ↑
e2

“grapevine (Vitis vinifera) - downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher CO2 did not influence powdery mildew incidence.

Taxon
grapevineVitise2
Treatment
increase in CO2e0
Interactor
Erysiphe necatrixe3pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildew incidencee0
Direction
did not influencede0
Comparator
standard CO2 concentratione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in CO2 did not influenced powdery mildew incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1404 · show in text ↑
e1

“standard CO2 concentration (450 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–641 · show in text ↑
e2

“grapevine (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–209 · show in text ↑
e3

“powdery mildew (Erysiphe necatrix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–285 · show in text ↑

co2 · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.