Paper · 2011

Effect of decapitation time on anti-lodging and yield within flax plant

Zhou Jing

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effect of five decapitation treatment of the first topping time for the bud of the day,after squaring 5 d,10 d,15 d,20 d were studied on flax anti-lodging,yield and quality.The results showed that from the budding stage to the day after budding 20 d,with the topping over time,the field lodging rate increased from 4.5% to 26.5% and lodging degree aggravated appropriately,while its vertical hemp plants reduced from 90.5% to 65.5%;its height and process length increased from 70.5 cm to 80.5 cm and stem diameter decreased from 0.262 cm to 0.240 cm.Stem yield of budding 5 d and 10 d after decapitation treatment reduction(4.45%-5.64%) had no obvious change,but other treatment reduced significantly compared with control.The fiber quality of topping treatment in different time was improved;its single fiber strength reinforced 19.72%-34.25% and the degree of fiber splitting increased 2.24%-5.88%.Therefore,from the field lodging and the yield into account,the optimum decapitation time treatment should be 5-10 d after budding at the later growth stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later topping increased the field lodging rate from 4.5% to 26.5% relative to the budding stage.

Treatment
topping over timee2
Outcome
field lodging ratee2
Direction
increasede2
Value
from 4.5% to 26.5%e2
Comparator
budding stagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of decapitation time on anti-lodging and yield within flax plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“from the budding stage to the day after budding 20 d,with the topping over time,the field lodging rate increased from 4.5% to 26.5% and lodging degree aggravated appropriately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later topping aggravated the lodging degree.

Treatment
topping over timee2
Outcome
lodging degreee2
Direction
aggravatede2
Comparator
budding stagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of decapitation time on anti-lodging and yield within flax plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“from the budding stage to the day after budding 20 d,with the topping over time,the field lodging rate increased from 4.5% to 26.5% and lodging degree aggravated appropriately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later topping reduced the proportion of vertical hemp plants from 90.5% to 65.5%.

Treatment
topping over timee2
Outcome
vertical hemp plantse3
Direction
reducede3
Value
from 90.5% to 65.5%e3
Comparator
budding stagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of decapitation time on anti-lodging and yield within flax plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“from the budding stage to the day after budding 20 d,with the topping over time,the field lodging rate increased from 4.5% to 26.5% and lodging degree aggravated appropriately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–372 · show in text ↑
e3

“while its vertical hemp plants reduced from 90.5% to 65.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later topping increased plant height and process length from 70.5 cm to 80.5 cm.

Treatment
topping over timee2
Outcome
height and process lengthe4
Direction
increasede4
Value
from 70.5 cm to 80.5 cme4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of decapitation time on anti-lodging and yield within flax plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“from the budding stage to the day after budding 20 d,with the topping over time,the field lodging rate increased from 4.5% to 26.5% and lodging degree aggravated appropriately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–372 · show in text ↑
e4

“its height and process length increased from 70.5 cm to 80.5 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later topping decreased stem diameter from 0.262 cm to 0.240 cm.

Treatment
topping over timee2
Outcome
stem diametere5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
from 0.262 cm to 0.240 cme5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of decapitation time on anti-lodging and yield within flax plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“from the budding stage to the day after budding 20 d,with the topping over time,the field lodging rate increased from 4.5% to 26.5% and lodging degree aggravated appropriately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–372 · show in text ↑
e5

“stem diameter decreased from 0.262 cm to 0.240 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem yield after decapitation at 5 and 10 days after budding showed no obvious change (4.45%-5.64%).

Treatment
decapitation treatmente6
Outcome
Stem yielde6
Direction
no obvious changee6
Value
4.45%-5.64%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of decapitation time on anti-lodging and yield within flax plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e6

“Stem yield of budding 5 d and 10 d after decapitation treatment reduction(4.45%-5.64%) had no obvious change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Other decapitation treatments significantly reduced stem yield compared with control.

Treatment
other treatmente7
Outcome
Stem yielde6
Direction
reducede7
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of decapitation time on anti-lodging and yield within flax plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e6

“Stem yield of budding 5 d and 10 d after decapitation treatment reduction(4.45%-5.64%) had no obvious change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–658 · show in text ↑
e7

“but other treatment reduced significantly compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping treatment at different times improved flax fiber quality.

Treatment
topping treatment in different timee0
Outcome
fiber qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of decapitation time on anti-lodging and yield within flax plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fiber quality of topping treatment in different time was improved;its single fiber strength reinforced 19.72%-34.25% and the degree of fiber splitting increased 2.24%-5.88%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping treatment at different times reinforced single fiber strength by 19.72%-34.25%.

Treatment
topping treatment in different timee0
Outcome
single fiber strengthe0
Direction
reinforcede0
Value
19.72%-34.25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of decapitation time on anti-lodging and yield within flax plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fiber quality of topping treatment in different time was improved;its single fiber strength reinforced 19.72%-34.25% and the degree of fiber splitting increased 2.24%-5.88%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping treatment at different times increased the degree of fiber splitting by 2.24%-5.88%.

Treatment
topping treatment in different timee0
Outcome
degree of fiber splittinge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.24%-5.88%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of decapitation time on anti-lodging and yield within flax plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fiber quality of topping treatment in different time was improved;its single fiber strength reinforced 19.72%-34.25% and the degree of fiber splitting increased 2.24%-5.88%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–899 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Considering lodging and yield, the optimum decapitation time is 5-10 days after budding at the later growth stage.

Organ / stage
later growth stagee1
Outcome
optimum decapitation timee1
Value
5-10 d after buddinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of decapitation time on anti-lodging and yield within flax plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“from the field lodging and the yield into account,the optimum decapitation time treatment should be 5-10 d after budding at the later growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1056 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · growth · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.