Paper · 2010 · Journal of Environmental Entomology

Community dynamics of wheat aphid natural enemies in wheat-oilseed rape or wheat-garlic intercropping fields

Ji Xiang

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The dynamics of wheat aphid natural enemy community in different intercropping patterns (wheat-oilseed rape intercropping, wheat-garlic intercropping and monoculture) were investigated with biodiversity measures including species richness (S), dominance (D), Shannon's Index (H′), and evenness (E). It was showed that the species richness of natural enemies in wheat-oilseed rape intercropping pattern was almost higher than those of the other two patterns during the investigation period. However, the other two patterns were similar in the whole stage of investigation. The dominant species of natural enemies among the three planting patterns were different at the beginning of investigation, but in the mid-and late-stage were Aphidius avenae. During investigation, diversity index of natural enemies in wheat-oilseed rape intercropping pattern was the highest. After May 8, the dominance of A. avenae in wheat-oilseed rape intercropping pattern was the lowest with significant difference compared with the other two patterns, and the index of evenness was the highest. It is concluded that in wheat-oilseed rape intercropping pattern, with higher species richness and higher stability community of natural enemies, it could control wheat aphid infection especially in early wheat filling stage, and there was no obvious effect of wheat-garlic intercropping on community structure and dynamics of wheat aphid natural enemies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species richness of wheat aphid natural enemies was almost higher in wheat-oilseed rape intercropping than in the other two patterns during the investigation.

Treatment
wheat-oilseed rape intercropping patterne1
Interactor
natural enemiese1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
species richness of natural enemiese1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
the other two patternse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the species richness of natural enemies in wheat-oilseed rape intercropping pattern was almost higher than those of the other two patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat-garlic intercropping and monoculture patterns were similar to each other in natural enemy richness across the investigation.

Outcome
similar in the whole stage of investigatione1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“the other two patterns were similar in the whole stage of investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The diversity index of natural enemies was the highest in the wheat-oilseed rape intercropping pattern.

Treatment
wheat-oilseed rape intercropping patterne1
Interactor
natural enemiese1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
diversity index of natural enemiese1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e1

“diversity index of natural enemies in wheat-oilseed rape intercropping pattern was the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After May 8 the dominance of A. avenae was the lowest in wheat-oilseed rape intercropping, with a significant difference from the other two patterns.

Treatment
wheat-oilseed rape intercropping patterne1
Interactor
A. avenaeAphidius avenaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
dominance of A. avenaee1
Direction
loweste1
Comparator
the other two patternse1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“the dominance of A. avenae in wheat-oilseed rape intercropping pattern was the lowest with significant difference compared with the other two patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After May 8 the evenness index of natural enemies was the highest in wheat-oilseed rape intercropping.

Treatment
wheat-oilseed rape intercropping patterne1
Outcome
index of evennesse1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
the other two patternse1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“After May 8, the dominance of A. avenae in wheat-oilseed rape intercropping pattern was the lowest with significant difference compared with the other two patterns, and the index of evenness was the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1072 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dominant natural enemy species differed among the three planting patterns at the beginning, but was Aphidius avenae in the mid and late stages.

Interactor
Aphidius avenaeAphidius avenaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
dominant species of natural enemiese1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“The dominant species of natural enemies among the three planting patterns were different at the beginning of investigation, but in the mid-and late-stage were Aphidius avenae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–746 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that wheat-oilseed rape intercropping, with higher natural enemy richness and community stability, could control wheat aphid infection especially in the early wheat filling stage.

Treatment
wheat-oilseed rape intercropping patterne1
Interactor
wheat aphide1pest
Second interactor
natural enemiese1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control wheat aphid infectione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in wheat-oilseed rape intercropping pattern, with higher species richness and higher stability community of natural enemies, it could control wheat aphid infection especially in early wheat filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat-garlic intercropping had no obvious effect on the community structure and dynamics of wheat aphid natural enemies.

Treatment
wheat-garlic intercroppinge1
Interactor
natural enemiese1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
community structure and dynamics of wheat aphid natural enemiese1
Direction
no obvious effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“there was no obvious effect of wheat-garlic intercropping on community structure and dynamics of wheat aphid natural enemies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1428 · show in text ↑

Brassica napus · ecology: diversity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

intercropping · ecology: diversity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.