Paper · 2004 · Tianjin Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Base Fertilizer Applied in Different Periods on Growth and Yield of Grape

Li Wei

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiments were conducted to compare the growth and yield difference between base fertilizer applied in spring and autumn. The results showed that there was no significant difference on nutritional growth of grape between base fertilizer applied in autumn and spring. While in the aspect of yield and sugar content compared with base fertilizer applied in autumn,it could save labor and decrease the production cost when base fertilizer applied in spring. When fertilizing is inconvenient in autumn the fertilizing in spring should be the best choice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Base fertilizer applied in spring and autumn gave no significant difference in grape nutritional growth.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
base fertilizere1
Outcome
nutritional growthe1
Direction
no significant differencee1
Comparator
autumne1

Verbatim

t0

“Growth and Yield of Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was no significant difference on nutritional growth of grape between base fertilizer applied in autumn and spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–277 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.