Paper · 2013 · Zhongguo tangliao

Effects of Sugarcane Intercropping with Potato on the Sugarcane Yield and Quality

Jingmei Dao

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of different row spacing(average row width or wide and narrow row spacing) and intercropping with potato under different manure applications were studied in this article.Experiment results showed that there were significant differences in growth height and stem diameter of sugarcane between different row spacing.,intercropping with potato had a marked effect on growth height and stem diameter in the stage of sugarcane growth but different manure applications had no significant effect.Moreover,both intercropping with potato and different manure applications had no effect on the quality of sugarcane.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane growth height and stem diameter differed significantly between row spacings.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
growth height and stem diametere0
Comparator
different row spacinge0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant differences in growth height and stem diameter of sugarcane between different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato intercropping markedly affected sugarcane growth height and stem diameter.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
intercropping with potatoe0
Interactor
potatoSolanum tuberosume0other
Outcome
growth height and stem diametere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with potato had a marked effect on growth height and stem diameter in the stage of sugarcane growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–439 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane Intercropping with Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different manure applications had no significant effect on sugarcane growth height and stem diameter.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
different manure applicationse0
Outcome
growth height and stem diametere1
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“different manure applications had no significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–499 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth height and stem diameter in the stage of sugarcane growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–439 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane Intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither potato intercropping nor different manure applications affected sugarcane quality.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
quality of sugarcanee0
Direction
no effecte0

Verbatim

e0

“both intercropping with potato and different manure applications had no effect on the quality of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–615 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.