Paper · 2012

Effects of aqueous extracts from the stems and leaves of Trifolium pratense cv. Minshan on germination and seedling growth of three crops

Kang Sheng-fu

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The allelopathy effects of aqueous extract from Trifolium pratense cv.Minshan on three receptor plants were investigated through bioassay of seed germination and seedling growth.Red clover stems and leaves were soaked in distilled water for 48 hours.Then distilled water was added to create four grades of concentrations(0.05,0.10,0.15 and 0.20 g·mL-1).The results showed that different concentrations of aqueous extract from the stem and leaf of red clover had different allelopathy effects on germination and seedling development of the three receptor plants.There was no significant difference on germination rate for all three receptor plants among the four concentrations of aqueous extract.However,soaking solution(less than 0.20 g·mL-1) did significantly inhibit the radicle and seedling growth of pakchoi(P0.05).Soaking solution at 0.2 g·mL-1 concentration significantly reduced the radicle growth of oat,Dahurian wildrye,and pakchoi by 23.76%,35.73% and 62.50%(P0.05),respectively.Soaking solution at 0.05 g·mL-1,however,significantly promoted the growth of Dahurian wildrye(P0.05).Among the three receptors,pakchoi was the most sensitive to the aqueous extract.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract concentration did not significantly change germination rate among the three receptor plants.

Taxon
three cropst0
Treatment
four concentrations of aqueous extracte0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
four concentrations of aqueous extracte0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference on germination rate for all three receptor plants among the four concentrations of aqueous extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“three crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract below 0.20 g·mL-1 significantly inhibited pakchoi radicle and seedling growth.

Taxon
pakchoie0
Treatment
soaking solution(less than 0.20 g·mL-1)e0
Outcome
radicle and seedling growthe0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soaking solution(less than 0.20 g·mL-1) did significantly inhibit the radicle and seedling growth of pakchoi(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.2 g·mL-1, the solution reduced oat radicle growth by 23.76%.

Treatment
Soaking solution at 0.2 g·mL-1e0
Outcome
radicle growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
23.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking solution at 0.2 g·mL-1 concentration significantly reduced the radicle growth of oat,Dahurian wildrye,and pakchoi by 23.76%,35.73% and 62.50%(P0.05),respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.2 g·mL-1, the solution reduced Dahurian wildrye radicle growth by 35.73%.

Taxon
Dahurian wildryee0
Treatment
Soaking solution at 0.2 g·mL-1e0
Outcome
radicle growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
35.73%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking solution at 0.2 g·mL-1 concentration significantly reduced the radicle growth of oat,Dahurian wildrye,and pakchoi by 23.76%,35.73% and 62.50%(P0.05),respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.2 g·mL-1, the solution reduced pakchoi radicle growth by 62.50%.

Taxon
pakchoie0
Treatment
Soaking solution at 0.2 g·mL-1e0
Outcome
radicle growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
62.50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking solution at 0.2 g·mL-1 concentration significantly reduced the radicle growth of oat,Dahurian wildrye,and pakchoi by 23.76%,35.73% and 62.50%(P0.05),respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.05 g·mL-1, the solution promoted Dahurian wildrye growth.

Taxon
Dahurian wildryee0
Treatment
Soaking solution at 0.05 g·mL-1e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking solution at 0.05 g·mL-1,however,significantly promoted the growth of Dahurian wildrye(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1090 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pakchoi was the most sensitive of the three crops to aqueous extract.

Taxon
pakchoie0
Outcome
most sensitive to the aqueous extracte0
Direction
most sensitivee0
Comparator
three receptorse0

Verbatim

e0

“Among the three receptors,pakchoi was the most sensitive to the aqueous extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1171 · show in text ↑

application · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 26 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.