Abstract
SO2 injury threshold of four different varieties table grapes in Xinjiang province at different fumigation level were investigated. And the soluble solid content (SSC), rigidity, pH, SO2 accumulation in pericarp and sarcocarp were determined at the end of the shelf life. Results showed that SSC and rigidity were declined compared with the control. pH was not significantly changed. Results of continuous SO2 fumigation showed that the total sulfur was increased along with the storage time. But the excessively accumulation of sulfite was not appeared both in pericarp and sarcocarp.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
SO2 fumigation reduced soluble solids and rigidity relative to control grapes.
Verbatim
e0“Results showed that SSC and rigidity were declined compared with the control.”
t0“Table Grapes”
e2“SO2 injury threshold of four different varieties table grapes in Xinjiang province at different fumigation level”
e3“compared with the control”
e4“continuous SO2 fumigation”
Claim · model-written summary
SO2 fumigation did not significantly change pH.
Verbatim
e0“pH was not significantly changed.”
t0“Table Grapes”
e2“SO2 injury threshold of four different varieties table grapes in Xinjiang province at different fumigation level”
e3“compared with the control”
e4“continuous SO2 fumigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Total sulfur increased with storage time under continuous SO2 fumigation.
Verbatim
e0“Results of continuous SO2 fumigation showed that the total sulfur was increased along with the storage time.”
t0“Table Grapes”
e2“SO2 injury threshold of four different varieties table grapes in Xinjiang province at different fumigation level”
e3“compared with the control”
e4“continuous SO2 fumigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Excess sulfite did not accumulate in grape pericarp or sarcocarp.
Verbatim
e0“But the excessively accumulation of sulfite was not appeared both in pericarp and sarcocarp.”
t0“Table Grapes”
e2“SO2 injury threshold of four different varieties table grapes in Xinjiang province at different fumigation level”
e3“compared with the control”
e4“continuous SO2 fumigation”
The same questions in other papers
solarization · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
pollution · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →pollution · soil: chemistry · VitisResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.