Paper · 2011 · Anhui nongye kexue

Analysis of Farmer Participating Evaluation for Intercropping between Upland Rice and Maize

Wen Lu

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The farmer participating evaluation under five experiments,including 10,12,14 rows upland rice intercropped with 2 rows,respectively and single cropping with 5 rows maize,were employed to optimize the intercropping model.Meanwhile,the Land Equivalent Ratio(LER) and the Relative Value of Testing(RVT) was analyzed.The results showed that the intercropping model of 14 rows intercropped with 2 rows maize presented the yield of 5 719.5 kg/hm2 and 8 701.2 yuan/hm2 income.Compared with single intercropping of upland rice,the yield increased 2 163 kg/hm2 and income increased 3 130.4 yuan/hm2,the increasing ratio was up to 52.9%.The LER was 1.37 and the RVT was 1,53.71.4% participated farmers considered that intercropping between upland rice and maize was a good intercropping model even it was higher input than single cropping of upland rice and like to select this model using in future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 14 row rice and 2 row maize intercrop yielded 5 719.5 kg/hm2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
14 rows intercropped with 2 rows maizee0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
5 719.5 kg/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Rice and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“intercropping model of 14 rows intercropped with 2 rows maize presented the yield of 5 719.5 kg/hm2 and 8 701.2 yuan/hm2 income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intercrop generated 8 701.2 yuan/hm2 income.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
14 rows intercropped with 2 rows maizee0
Outcome
incomee0
Value
8 701.2 yuan/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Rice and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“intercropping model of 14 rows intercropped with 2 rows maize presented the yield of 5 719.5 kg/hm2 and 8 701.2 yuan/hm2 income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increased by 2 163 kg/hm2 relative to single cropping of upland rice.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2 163 kg/hm2e0
Comparator
single intercropping of upland ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Rice and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with single intercropping of upland rice,the yield increased 2 163 kg/hm2 and income increased 3 130.4 yuan/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Income increased by 3 130.4 yuan/hm2 relative to single cropping of upland rice.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
incomee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3 130.4 yuan/hm2e0
Comparator
single intercropping of upland ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Rice and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with single intercropping of upland rice,the yield increased 2 163 kg/hm2 and income increased 3 130.4 yuan/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–590 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The land equivalent ratio was 1.37.

Taxon
Upland RiceOryza sativat0
Outcome
LERe0
Value
1.37e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Rice and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The LER was 1.37 and the RVT was 1,53.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative value of testing was 1,53.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
RVTe0
Value
1,53e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Rice and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The LER was 1.37 and the RVT was 1,53.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers favored the intercrop despite higher input than rice alone.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Outcome
participated farmers considered that intercropping between upland rice and maize was a good intercropping modele0
Value
71.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Rice and Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“71.4% participated farmers considered that intercropping between upland rice and maize was a good intercropping model even it was higher input than single cropping of upland rice and like to select this model using in future.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–891 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

95 papers: 77 positive, 18 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.