Paper · 2005 · Xibei Linxueyuan xuebao

The Effect of Different Bagging Period on the Quality of Red Fuji Apple in Weibai Dryland

Bingzhi Li

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of different bagging period on the inside and outside fruit quality of Nagafa 2 Red Fuji apple (Malus pumila) was investigated. The results showed that the earlier fruit bagging, the lower in chlorophyll and carotonoid contents,10 days after withering chlorophyll and carotonoid contents were 34.8 μg·g~(-1) and 7.4 μg·g~(-1) respectively, fruit green color completely disappeared, fruit surface was clean and beautiful, outside fruit quality was improved; soluble solids content and firmness were decreased, inside fruit quality was decreased. Bagging the fruit in late stage, chlorophyll and carotonoid contents were higher. 80 days after withering, chlorophyll and carotonoid contents were 136.4 μg·g~(-1)and 35.9 μg·g~(-1) respectively, fruit green incompletely disappeared, fruit was yellow and green on background, outside fruit quality was decreased, soluble solids and titratable acidity contents were increased, inside fruit quality was increased. The optimal bagging period is 40 to 50 days after full bloom in Weibai arid area with the altitude of 950 m.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier bagging lowered chlorophyll to 34.8 μg·g~(-1) at 10 days after withering.

Treatment
earlier fruit bagginge0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
lowere0
Value
34.8 μg·g~(-1)e0
Qualifier
10 days after witheringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the earlier fruit bagging, the lower in chlorophyll and carotonoid contents,10 days after withering chlorophyll and carotonoid contents were 34.8 μg·g~(-1) and 7.4 μg·g~(-1) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Fuji Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier bagging lowered carotonoids to 7.4 μg·g~(-1).

Treatment
earlier fruit bagginge0
Outcome
carotonoid contentse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
7.4 μg·g~(-1)e0
Qualifier
10 days after witheringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the earlier fruit bagging, the lower in chlorophyll and carotonoid contents,10 days after withering chlorophyll and carotonoid contents were 34.8 μg·g~(-1) and 7.4 μg·g~(-1) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Fuji Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early bagging eliminated green color and improved outside fruit quality.

Treatment
Baggingt0
Outcome
outside fruit qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit green color completely disappeared, fruit surface was clean and beautiful, outside fruit quality was improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bagging Period on the Quality of Red Fuji Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early bagging reduced soluble solids content and firmness and inside quality.

Treatment
Baggingt0
Outcome
soluble solids content and firmnesse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soluble solids content and firmness were decreased, inside fruit quality was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bagging Period on the Quality of Red Fuji Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late bagging yielded chlorophyll content of 136.4 μg·g~(-1) after 80 days.

Treatment
Bagging the fruit in late stagee0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
highere0
Value
136.4 μg·g~(-1)e0
Qualifier
80 days after witheringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bagging the fruit in late stage, chlorophyll and carotonoid contents were higher. 80 days after withering, chlorophyll and carotonoid contents were 136.4 μg·g~(-1)and 35.9 μg·g~(-1) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Fuji Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late bagging yielded carotonoid content of 35.9 μg·g~(-1) after 80 days.

Outcome
carotonoid contentse0
Direction
highere0
Value
35.9 μg·g~(-1)e0
Qualifier
80 days after witheringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bagging the fruit in late stage, chlorophyll and carotonoid contents were higher. 80 days after withering, chlorophyll and carotonoid contents were 136.4 μg·g~(-1)and 35.9 μg·g~(-1) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Fuji Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late bagging left green background color and reduced outside fruit quality.

Treatment
Baggingt0
Outcome
outside fruit qualitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit green incompletely disappeared, fruit was yellow and green on background, outside fruit quality was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bagging Period on the Quality of Red Fuji Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late bagging increased soluble solids and titratable acidity and improved inside quality.

Treatment
Baggingt0
Outcome
soluble solids and titratable acidity contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soluble solids and titratable acidity contents were increased, inside fruit quality was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bagging Period on the Quality of Red Fuji Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–71 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal bagging period was 40 to 50 days after full bloom in Weibai arid area.

Outcome
40 to 50 days after full bloome0
Qualifier
altitude of 950 me0
Setting
Weibai arid areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal bagging period is 40 to 50 days after full bloom in Weibai arid area with the altitude of 950 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Fuji Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–71 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

10 papers: 3 positive, 7 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

trap barrier · quality: grain · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.