Paper · 2011 · Environmental Pollution & Control

Physiological response of rape to copper stress and copper enrichment characteristics in stem and seeds of rape

Ming Yuan

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of different copper concentration(0,50,100,200,400 mg/kg) on the growth,yield,mineral elements contents and enrichment characteristics of copper in stem and seeds of rape(B.napus cv.Qinyou 9) were studied in a pot culture experiment.Compared with the control,low copper level(50 mg/kg) stimulated the rape growth to some extent,the plant biomass,yield and mineral elements contents were slightly higher or equivalent to CK,but their difference was not significant.With the increasing of copper concentration in soil,the plant biomass,photosynthetic rate,yield,mineral elements contents,height and main inflorescence length all decreased obviously,while the change of first branch number was no significant.The copper enrichment characteristics of above-ground organs of rape showed significant difference.In general,copper concentration in stem was higher than that in seeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixednot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low copper slightly raised or maintained biomass, yield, and mineral contents without a significant difference.

Treatment
low copper level(50 mg/kg)e0
Outcome
plant biomass,yield and mineral elements contentse0
Direction
slightly higher or equivalente0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low copper level(50 mg/kg) stimulated the rape growth to some extent,the plant biomass,yield and mineral elements contents were slightly higher or equivalent to CK,but their difference was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–471 · show in text ↑
e1

“rape(B.napus cv.Qinyou 9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil copper reduced biomass and photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
increasing of copper concentration in soile0
Outcome
plant biomass,photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increasing of copper concentration in soil,the plant biomass,photosynthetic rate,yield,mineral elements contents,height and main inflorescence length all decreased obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“rape(B.napus cv.Qinyou 9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil copper reduced yield, mineral content, height and main inflorescence length.

Treatment
increasing of copper concentration in soile0
Outcome
yield,mineral elements contents,height and main inflorescence lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increasing of copper concentration in soil,the plant biomass,photosynthetic rate,yield,mineral elements contents,height and main inflorescence length all decreased obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“rape(B.napus cv.Qinyou 9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

First branch number showed no significant change with increasing copper.

Outcome
first branch numbere0
Direction
no significante0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the change of first branch number was no significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–713 · show in text ↑
e1

“rape(B.napus cv.Qinyou 9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper concentration was higher in stems than seeds.

Organ / stage
steme0
Outcome
copper concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
seedse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“copper concentration in stem was higher than that in seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–882 · show in text ↑
e1

“rape(B.napus cv.Qinyou 9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–199 · show in text ↑

copper atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

copper atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.