Abstract
Fluazifop-P, applied in the spring or fall and pronamide, applied in the fall only, reduced quackgrass infestation in established alfalfa and increased the dry matter yield of alfalfa. Herbicides did not improve alfalfa in vitro digestibility or crude protein content. Average residues of fluazifop-P in alfalfa treated with rates of 0.25 or 0.5 kg ai ha –1 , were 0.1 mg kg –1 when harvested 280 d after application, and 0.06 mg kg –1 when harvested 295 d after application. Average residues in alfalfa harvested 41 and 55 d after application were 0.13 mg kg –1 and 0.1 mg kg –1 , respectively, with a 0.25 kg ha –1 treatment and 0.19 mg kg –1 and 0.05 mg kg –1 , respectively, with a 0.5 kg ha –1 treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Spring or fall fluazifop-P reduced quackgrass infestation in alfalfa.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- Fluazifop-P, applied in the spring or falle0
- Interactor
- quackgrasse0weed
- Outcome
- quackgrass infestatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fluazifop-P, applied in the spring or fall and pronamide, applied in the fall only, reduced quackgrass infestation in established alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Fall pronamide reduced quackgrass infestation in alfalfa.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- pronamide, applied in the fall onlye0
- Interactor
- quackgrasse0weed
- Outcome
- quackgrass infestatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fluazifop-P, applied in the spring or fall and pronamide, applied in the fall only, reduced quackgrass infestation in established alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluazifop-P increased alfalfa dry matter yield.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- Fluazifop-Pe0
- Outcome
- dry matter yield of alfalfae0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fluazifop-P, applied in the spring or fall and pronamide, applied in the fall only, reduced quackgrass infestation in established alfalfa and increased the dry matter yield of alfalfa.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pronamide increased alfalfa dry matter yield.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- pronamidee0
- Outcome
- dry matter yield of alfalfae0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fluazifop-P, applied in the spring or fall and pronamide, applied in the fall only, reduced quackgrass infestation in established alfalfa and increased the dry matter yield of alfalfa.”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicides did not improve alfalfa digestibility or crude protein.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- Herbicidese0
- Outcome
- in vitro digestibility or crude protein contente0
- Direction
- did not improvee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Herbicides did not improve alfalfa in vitro digestibility or crude protein content.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluazifop-P residues averaged 0.1 mg kg –1 at 280 days after application.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- fluazifop-Pe0
- Outcome
- residues of fluazifop-Pe0
- Value
- 0.1 mg kg –1e0
- Qualifier
- 280 d after applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Average residues of fluazifop-P in alfalfa treated with rates of 0.25 or 0.5 kg ai ha –1 , were 0.1 mg kg –1 when harvested 280 d after application”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluazifop-P residues averaged 0.06 mg kg –1 at 295 days after application.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae1
- Treatment
- fluazifop-Pe1
- Outcome
- residues of fluazifop-Pe1
- Value
- 0.06 mg kg –1e0
- Qualifier
- 295 d after applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“0.06 mg kg –1 when harvested 295 d after application”
e1“Average residues of fluazifop-P in alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
At 0.25 kg ha –1, residues averaged 0.13 mg kg –1 at 41 days.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- 0.25 kg ha –1 treatmente0
- Outcome
- residuese0
- Value
- 0.13 mg kg –1e0
- Qualifier
- 41 and 55 d after applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Average residues in alfalfa harvested 41 and 55 d after application were 0.13 mg kg –1 and 0.1 mg kg –1 , respectively, with a 0.25 kg ha –1 treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
At 0.25 kg ha –1, residues averaged 0.1 mg kg –1 at 55 days.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- 0.25 kg ha –1 treatmente0
- Outcome
- residuese0
- Value
- 0.1 mg kg –1e0
- Qualifier
- 41 and 55 d after applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Average residues in alfalfa harvested 41 and 55 d after application were 0.13 mg kg –1 and 0.1 mg kg –1 , respectively, with a 0.25 kg ha –1 treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
At 0.5 kg ha –1, residues averaged 0.19 mg kg –1 at 41 days.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- 0.5 kg ha –1 treatmente1
- Outcome
- residuese0
- Value
- 0.19 mg kg –1e1
- Qualifier
- 41 and 55 d after applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Average residues in alfalfa harvested 41 and 55 d after application”
e1“0.19 mg kg –1 and 0.05 mg kg –1 , respectively, with a 0.5 kg ha –1 treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
At 0.5 kg ha –1, residues averaged 0.05 mg kg –1 at 55 days.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- 0.5 kg ha –1 treatmente1
- Outcome
- residuese0
- Value
- 0.05 mg kg –1e1
- Qualifier
- 41 and 55 d after applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Average residues in alfalfa harvested 41 and 55 d after application”
e1“0.19 mg kg –1 and 0.05 mg kg –1 , respectively, with a 0.5 kg ha –1 treatment”
The same questions in other papers
propyzamide · pest · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
propyzamide · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →herbicide · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.