Paper · 2013 · He'nan nongye kexue

Effects of Plant Growth Regulator Matter(PGRM) on Phenolic Content and Its Enzyme Activities of Flue-cured Tobacco under Different Roasting Technology

Han Fu-gen

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To select appropriate plant growth regulator matters(PGRM) of tobacco and optimize roasting techniques,this paper studied the effect of PGRM on dynamic changes of water content,PPO activity and polyphenol content of tobacco during roasting process through plant growthregulator sprays and roasting technology controls.The results showed that,there were significantly different water contents of tobacco leaves among the different PGRM treatments.During 0-36 h,the water content of tobacco was decreased very slowly,and during anaphase,it decreasedobviously under the normal roasting technology.The PPO activity was decreased with roasting time,reaching the lowest point at 60 h under the normal roasting technology.But under the abnormal roasting technology,the PPO activity was decreased at first,and then increased,with the lowest point significantly higher than that under the normal roasting technology.There was no significant difference of polyphenol contents among most treatments,which had an increasing trend compared with control.During roasting prophase,the polyphenol content of PGRM treatment rose,but when entering the roasting anaphase,it was close to the contents in the other treatments.The ratio of high grade flue-cured tobacco in PGRM treatments was significantly higher than that of CK under two roasting conditions.And there was also a higher ratio of high grade flue-cured tobacco under normal roasting technology in comparison with that under abnormal roasting technology.It suggested that applying PGRM could increase the high grade flue-cured tobacco in particular the treatment T4 and T7.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water content differed significantly among PGRM treatments.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Organ / stage
tobacco leavese0
Treatment
different PGRM treatmentse0
Outcome
water contentse0
Direction
differente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there were significantly different water contents of tobacco leaves among the different PGRM treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under normal roasting, tobacco water content decreased slowly in the first 36 hours and more markedly later.

Outcome
water contente0
Direction
decreased very slowlye0
Setting
normal roasting technologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During 0-36 h,the water content of tobacco was decreased very slowly,and during anaphase,it decreasedobviously under the normal roasting technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–593 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPO activity decreased during normal roasting and reached its lowest point at 60 h.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Outcome
PPO activitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
60 he0
Setting
normal roasting technologye0

Verbatim

e0

“The PPO activity was decreased with roasting time,reaching the lowest point at 60 h under the normal roasting technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under abnormal roasting, PPO activity first decreased and then increased.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Outcome
PPO activitye0
Direction
decreased at first,and then increasede0
Setting
abnormal roasting technologye0

Verbatim

e0

“under the abnormal roasting technology,the PPO activity was decreased at first,and then increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest PPO activity under abnormal roasting was significantly higher than under normal roasting.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
abnormal roasting technologye1
Outcome
PPO activitye1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
normal roasting technologye0

Verbatim

e0

“with the lowest point significantly higher than that under the normal roasting technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“under the abnormal roasting technology,the PPO activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyphenol content did not differ significantly among most treatments.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
most treatmentse0
Outcome
polyphenol contentse0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference of polyphenol contents among most treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyphenol content tended to increase relative to control.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
most treatmentse0
Outcome
polyphenol contentse0
Direction
increasing trende0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“polyphenol contents among most treatments,which had an increasing trend compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyphenol content rose during early roasting under PGRM treatment.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
PGRM treatmente0
Outcome
polyphenol contente0
Direction
rosee0
Qualifier
roasting prophasee0

Verbatim

e0

“During roasting prophase,the polyphenol content of PGRM treatment rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later in roasting, PGRM polyphenol content approached that of other treatments.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
PGRM treatmente1
Outcome
polyphenol contente1
Direction
close toe0
Qualifier
roasting anaphasee0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“when entering the roasting anaphase,it was close to the contents in the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1203 · show in text ↑
e1

“the polyphenol content of PGRM treatment rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGRM significantly increased the high grade tobacco ratio versus CK in both roasting conditions.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
PGRM treatmentse0
Outcome
ratio of high grade flue-cured tobaccoe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
two roasting conditionse0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of high grade flue-cured tobacco in PGRM treatments was significantly higher than that of CK under two roasting conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal roasting gave a higher high grade tobacco ratio than abnormal roasting.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
normal roasting technologye0
Outcome
ratio of high grade flue-cured tobaccoe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
abnormal roasting technologye0

Verbatim

e0

“there was also a higher ratio of high grade flue-cured tobacco under normal roasting technology in comparison with that under abnormal roasting technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1495 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest applying PGRM, especially T4 and T7, to increase high grade tobacco.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
applying PGRMe0
Outcome
increase the high grade flue-cured tobaccoe0
Qualifier
T4 and T7e0

Verbatim

e0

“It suggested that applying PGRM could increase the high grade flue-cured tobacco in particular the treatment T4 and T7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1614 · show in text ↑

processing · organism · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.