Paper · 2005 · Guangxi Agricultural Science

Evaluation of 13 herbicides on control of weed Cyperus rotundus L. in sugarcane field

Qin Jian

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of 13 herbicides on control of weed Cyperus rotundus L., which planted in shed covered with plastic film, was conducted by spraying on the leaves of the plant. And the safety to the crop was evaluated in some of the herbicides those showed high control effect in sugarcane field. The result showed that with the tested condition, chorimuron ethyl, sulfentrazone, ethoxysulfuron, bentaxone and MCPA gave a better control effects, topping 75%, but with the effects over 90%, rimsulfuron, flazasulfuron and imazapic gave the best ones compared with the others. Furthermore they could effectively kill the regenerated bulb of the weed. In poisonous effect on sugarcane, rimsulfuron was more serious than flazasulfuron, while imazapic was the most serious, which caused so badly injury to the crop that the poisoned plants couldn't return to normale. Some mixtures of the herbicides performed a highly selectivity in controlling the weed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chorimuron ethyl, sulfentrazone and ethoxysulfuron gave better control of Cyperus rotundus, topping 75%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
chorimuron ethyl, sulfentrazone, ethoxysulfurone1
Interactor
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotundust0weed
Outcome
control effectse1
Direction
bettere1
Value
topping 75%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“control of weed Cyperus rotundus L. in sugarcane field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“chorimuron ethyl, sulfentrazone, ethoxysulfuron, bentaxone and MCPA gave a better control effects, topping 75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentaxone and MCPA gave better control of Cyperus rotundus, topping 75%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
bentaxone and MCPAe1
Interactor
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotundust0weed
Outcome
control effectse1
Direction
bettere1
Value
topping 75%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“control of weed Cyperus rotundus L. in sugarcane field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“chorimuron ethyl, sulfentrazone, ethoxysulfuron, bentaxone and MCPA gave a better control effects, topping 75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rimsulfuron, flazasulfuron and imazapic gave the best control of Cyperus rotundus, over 90%, compared with the other herbicides.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
rimsulfuron, flazasulfuron and imazapice2
Interactor
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotundust0weed
Outcome
effectse2
Direction
the best onese2
Value
over 90%e2
Comparator
the otherse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“control of weed Cyperus rotundus L. in sugarcane field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“but with the effects over 90%, rimsulfuron, flazasulfuron and imazapic gave the best ones compared with the others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–567 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested herbicides could effectively kill the regenerated bulbs of Cyperus rotundus.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotundust0weed
Outcome
regenerated bulbe3
Qualifier
effectively kille3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“control of weed Cyperus rotundus L. in sugarcane field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“Furthermore they could effectively kill the regenerated bulb of the weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rimsulfuron caused more serious poisonous effect on sugarcane than flazasulfuron.

Taxon
sugarcanee4
Treatment
rimsulfurone4
Outcome
poisonous effect on sugarcanee4
Direction
more seriouse4
Comparator
flazasulfurone4

Verbatim

e4

“In poisonous effect on sugarcane, rimsulfuron was more serious than flazasulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapic caused the most serious injury to sugarcane, from which the poisoned plants did not recover.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
imazapice5
Outcome
injury to the crope5
Direction
the most seriouse5
Qualifier
the poisoned plants couldn't return to normalee5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“control of weed Cyperus rotundus L. in sugarcane field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–85 · show in text ↑
e5

“while imazapic was the most serious, which caused so badly injury to the crop that the poisoned plants couldn't return to normale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some mixtures of the herbicides were highly selective in controlling Cyperus rotundus.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
mixtures of the herbicidese6
Interactor
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotundust0weed
Outcome
selectivity in controlling the weede6
Qualifier
highly selectivitye6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“control of weed Cyperus rotundus L. in sugarcane field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“Some mixtures of the herbicides performed a highly selectivity in controlling the weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–943 · show in text ↑

imazapic · crop injury · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

sulfentrazone · Cyperus rotundus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Ethoxysulfuron · Cyperus rotundus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · Cyperus rotundus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.