Paper · 2012

Effect of pre-harvest calcium treatment on postharvest quality and storage of strawberry

Zhou Xu-bao

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of pre-harvest leaf spraying of calcium on the quality and storage performance in strawberry was observed.Leaves were applied CaCl2 at concentrations of 0.2%,0.5% or 0.8% at the stages of exiting the fruitlet,expanding fruit and changing fruit color.The fruits were harvested at commercial stage.The results showed that the firmness of strawberry were better with 0.5% and 0.8% Ca2+.There were no effects on the TSS and contents of total acid.But 0.8% Ca2+caused burns on the leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% calcium treatment improved strawberry fruit firmness.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
0.5%e0
Outcome
firmness of strawberrye0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the firmness of strawberry were better with 0.5% and 0.8% Ca2+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.8% calcium treatment improved strawberry fruit firmness.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
0.8%e0
Outcome
firmness of strawberrye0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the firmness of strawberry were better with 0.5% and 0.8% Ca2+”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium treatment had no reported effect on TSS and total acid content.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
calciumt0
Outcome
TSS and contents of total acide0
Direction
no effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no effects on the TSS and contents of total acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–453 · show in text ↑
t0

“pre-harvest calcium treatment on postharvest quality and storage of strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.8% calcium treatment burned strawberry leaves.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
0.8% Ca2+e0
Outcome
burns on the leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“But 0.8% Ca2+caused burns on the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.