Abstract
The experimental results indicated that the peanut grew under plastic film (special film) presented more branches, heavier fresh vine, more plump fruits and bigger pod than that without film, and the yield was more significant than unmulched peanut. The yield difference of peanuts between weeding film and light-degrading film was not obvious, but the crop under weeding or light-degrading films gave more yields, compared with the crop under common film or without film. The peanut cultivated early with film obtained higher stem, longer lateral branches than that cultivated late, and the former had advantage of the number of total branches and higher pod yield than the other treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Plastic film produced more branches.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- plastic film (special film)e0
- Outcome
- branchese0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- without filme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the peanut grew under plastic film (special film) presented more branches, heavier fresh vine, more plump fruits and bigger pod than that without film”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Plastic film produced heavier fresh vine.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- plastic film (special film)e0
- Outcome
- fresh vinee0
- Direction
- heaviere0
- Comparator
- without filme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the peanut grew under plastic film (special film) presented more branches, heavier fresh vine, more plump fruits and bigger pod than that without film”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Plastic film produced more plump fruits.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- plastic film (special film)e0
- Outcome
- fruitse0
- Direction
- more plumpe0
- Comparator
- without filme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the peanut grew under plastic film (special film) presented more branches, heavier fresh vine, more plump fruits and bigger pod than that without film”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Plastic film produced bigger pod.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- plastic film (special film)e0
- Outcome
- pode0
- Direction
- biggere0
- Comparator
- without filme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the peanut grew under plastic film (special film) presented more branches, heavier fresh vine, more plump fruits and bigger pod than that without film”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Film increased peanut yield versus unmulched peanut.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- plastic film (special film)e1
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- more significante0
- Comparator
- unmulched peanute0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the yield was more significant than unmulched peanut”
e1“the peanut grew under plastic film (special film) presented more branches, heavier fresh vine, more plump fruits and bigger pod than that without film”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Weeding film and light-degrading film had no obvious yield difference.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- weeding filme0
- Outcome
- yield difference of peanutse0
- Direction
- not obviouse0
- Comparator
- light-degrading filme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield difference of peanuts between weeding film and light-degrading film was not obvious”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
weeding film increased yield against common film or no film.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- weedinge0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- common film or without filme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the crop under weeding or light-degrading films gave more yields, compared with the crop under common film or without film”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
light-degrading film increased yield against common film or no film.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- light-degradinge0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- common film or without filme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the crop under weeding or light-degrading films gave more yields, compared with the crop under common film or without film”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Early film cultivation produced higher stem.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- cultivated early with filme0
- Outcome
- steme0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- cultivated latee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The peanut cultivated early with film obtained higher stem, longer lateral branches than that cultivated late, and the former had advantage of the number of total branches and higher pod yield than the other treatments”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Early film cultivation produced longer lateral branches.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- cultivated early with filme0
- Outcome
- lateral branchese0
- Direction
- longere0
- Comparator
- cultivated latee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The peanut cultivated early with film obtained higher stem, longer lateral branches than that cultivated late, and the former had advantage of the number of total branches and higher pod yield than the other treatments”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Early film cultivation produced advantage number of total branches.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- cultivated early with filme0
- Outcome
- number of total branchese0
- Direction
- advantagee0
- Comparator
- cultivated latee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The peanut cultivated early with film obtained higher stem, longer lateral branches than that cultivated late, and the former had advantage of the number of total branches and higher pod yield than the other treatments”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Early film cultivation produced higher pod yield.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- cultivated early with filme0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- cultivated latee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The peanut cultivated early with film obtained higher stem, longer lateral branches than that cultivated late, and the former had advantage of the number of total branches and higher pod yield than the other treatments”
t0“Peanut”
The same questions in other papers
mulching · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →light · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →mulching · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
226 papers more in this group
See all 230 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.