Abstract
With ‘Jinyou No.35’ as the scion and ‘liangzhan’ as the rootstock,cucumber were grafted cultivation,taking own-root cucumber as the control,the effects of grafting cultivation on quality of cucumber during storage were studied.The results showed that,in storage condition of(13±1) ℃,compared with the own-root cucumber,the weight loss rate of grafted cucumber was higher,the decline rate of fruit hardness was faster,the content of soluble sugar was lower,the content of total acid increased and higher than own-root cucumber,but the difference of content of soluble protein was not remarked.The reason might was that the grafted cucumber which taking ‘liangzhan’ as the rootstock had bright surface and its wax powder lost,and cucumber was easy to dehydrate and soft.So,grafted cucumber should be have suitable coating treatment after harvest to keep the fruit quality and prolong the storage period.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber had a higher weight loss rate than own-root cucumber in storage at (13±1) ℃.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativuse1 - Material
- Jinyou No.35e0
- Treatment
- grafted cultivatione0
- Outcome
- weight loss ratee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Qualifier
- storage condition of(13±1) ℃e1
- Comparator
- own-root cucumbere1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“With ‘Jinyou No.35’ as the scion and ‘liangzhan’ as the rootstock,cucumber were grafted cultivation,taking own-root cucumber as the control”
e1“in storage condition of(13±1) ℃,compared with the own-root cucumber,the weight loss rate of grafted cucumber was higher”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber had a faster decline rate of fruit hardness than own-root cucumber during storage.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- grafted cultivatione0
- Outcome
- decline rate of fruit hardnesse2
- Direction
- fastere2
- Comparator
- own-root cucumbere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“With ‘Jinyou No.35’ as the scion and ‘liangzhan’ as the rootstock,cucumber were grafted cultivation,taking own-root cucumber as the control”
e2“the decline rate of fruit hardness was faster”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber had a lower content of soluble sugar than own-root cucumber during storage.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- grafted cultivatione0
- Outcome
- content of soluble sugare3
- Direction
- lowere3
- Comparator
- own-root cucumbere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“With ‘Jinyou No.35’ as the scion and ‘liangzhan’ as the rootstock,cucumber were grafted cultivation,taking own-root cucumber as the control”
e3“the content of soluble sugar was lower”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber had a higher content of total acid than own-root cucumber during storage.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- grafted cultivatione0
- Outcome
- content of total acide4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Comparator
- own-root cucumbere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“With ‘Jinyou No.35’ as the scion and ‘liangzhan’ as the rootstock,cucumber were grafted cultivation,taking own-root cucumber as the control”
e4“the content of total acid increased and higher than own-root cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafting did not noticeably change the soluble protein content of cucumber during storage.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- grafted cultivatione0
- Outcome
- content of soluble proteine5
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede5
- Comparator
- own-root cucumbere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“With ‘Jinyou No.35’ as the scion and ‘liangzhan’ as the rootstock,cucumber were grafted cultivation,taking own-root cucumber as the control”
e5“but the difference of content of soluble protein was not remarked”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber dehydrates and softens because its wax powder is lost, according to the authors' explanation.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse6
- Outcome
- easy to dehydrate and softe6
- Qualifier
- its wax powder loste6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“With ‘Jinyou No.35’ as the scion and ‘liangzhan’ as the rootstock,cucumber were grafted cultivation,taking own-root cucumber as the control”
e6“The reason might was that the grafted cucumber which taking ‘liangzhan’ as the rootstock had bright surface and its wax powder lost,and cucumber was easy to dehydrate and soft”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber should receive a suitable coating treatment after harvest to keep fruit quality during storage.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse7
- Treatment
- suitable coating treatmente7
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“grafted cucumber should be have suitable coating treatment after harvest to keep the fruit quality and prolong the storage period”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · physiology: osmolytes · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →grafting · quality: postharvest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.