Paper · 2001 · Journal of Yellow Cattle Science

Effects of Different Compound Chemical Treatments on the Nutritional Value of Crop Straw

Mao Hua

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Improving Effects of Different Compound Chemical Treatments on the Nutritional Value of Crop Straw were studied. The results showed that the content of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) in wheat, oat and rye straw treated with 2.5% urea and 5.0% Ca (OH) 2 and/or pelleting was reduced from 71~81% to 67~75%. The content of crude protein in these treated crop straw was raised from 3.5~ 5.6% to 9.5~11.4% and the in vitro digestibility of organic matter was raised from 38~45% to 57~65%, which is raised by 17.5% and up to or higher than that of northeast sheep fescues and corn straw silage. By these compound treatments, rumen degradability and degrading rate of crop straw were also improved.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound chemical treatments reduced neutral detergent fiber content of wheat, oat and rye straw.

Treatment
2.5% urea and 5.0% Ca (OH) 2 and/or pelletinge1
Outcome
content of neutral detergent fiber (NDF)e1
Direction
reducede1
Value
71~81% to 67~75%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the content of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) in wheat, oat and rye straw treated with 2.5% urea and 5.0% Ca (OH) 2 and/or pelleting was reduced from 71~81% to 67~75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–302 · show in text ↑
e0

“Improving Effects of Different Compound Chemical Treatments on the Nutritional Value of Crop Straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound chemical treatments raised crude protein content of crop straw from 3.5~5.6% to 9.5~11.4%.

Treatment
compound treatmentse3
Outcome
content of crude proteine2
Direction
raisede2
Value
from 3.5~ 5.6% to 9.5~11.4%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in wheat, oat and rye straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“The content of crude protein in these treated crop straw was raised from 3.5~ 5.6% to 9.5~11.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–399 · show in text ↑
e3

“By these compound treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound chemical treatments raised in vitro digestibility of organic matter of crop straw from 38~45% to 57~65%.

Treatment
compound treatmentse3
Outcome
in vitro digestibility of organic mattere4
Direction
raisede4
Value
from 38~45% to 57~65%e4
Qualifier
raised by 17.5%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in wheat, oat and rye straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–209 · show in text ↑
e3

“By these compound treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–616 · show in text ↑
e4

“the in vitro digestibility of organic matter was raised from 38~45% to 57~65%, which is raised by 17.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound chemical treatments improved rumen degradability and degrading rate of crop straw.

Treatment
compound treatmentse3
Outcome
rumen degradability and degrading ratee3
Direction
improvede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in wheat, oat and rye straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–209 · show in text ↑
e3

“By these compound treatments, rumen degradability and degrading rate of crop straw were also improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digestibility of organic matter of compound-treated straw was up to or higher than that of northeast sheep fescues and corn straw silage.

Treatment
compound treatmentse3
Outcome
in vitro digestibility of organic mattere4
Direction
up to or higher thane5
Comparator
northeast sheep fescues and corn straw silagee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in wheat, oat and rye straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–209 · show in text ↑
e3

“By these compound treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–616 · show in text ↑
e4

“the in vitro digestibility of organic matter was raised from 38~45% to 57~65%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–481 · show in text ↑
e5

“up to or higher than that of northeast sheep fescues and corn straw silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–586 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

21 papers: 12 positive, 9 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

96 papers: 70 positive, 26 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

seed treatment · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Secale cereale (rye)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.