Abstract
The experiment was conducted by selecting the seep mulching plastic,compared with the ordinary polyethylene plastic,on the maintenance test in peanut.It included three treatments and repeated 4 times,totally 12 small areas.The result through chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b,the total quantity as well as the different cell membrane relative penetrable multiple comparisons in various times.It indicated that the seep mulching plastic made the peanut chlorophyll content increased,the photosynthesis strengthened,the dry material accumulation increased,the cell membrane relative penetrability reduced,the resistance enhanced.Thus caused the pod fruit production increased 9.8% than the ordinary mulching plastic cultivation and 65.4% than the open ground.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Seep mulching plastic increased peanut chlorophyll content compared with ordinary polyethylene plastic.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae2 - Treatment
- seep mulching plastice2
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- ordinary polyethylene plastice2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the seep mulching plastic made the peanut chlorophyll content increased”
e2“selecting the seep mulching plastic,compared with the ordinary polyethylene plastic,on the maintenance test in peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Seep mulching plastic strengthened photosynthesis in peanut compared with ordinary polyethylene plastic.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae2
- Treatment
- seep mulching plastice2
- Outcome
- photosynthesise0
- Direction
- strengthenede0
- Comparator
- ordinary polyethylene plastice2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the photosynthesis strengthened”
e2“selecting the seep mulching plastic,compared with the ordinary polyethylene plastic,on the maintenance test in peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Seep mulching plastic increased dry material accumulation in peanut compared with ordinary polyethylene plastic.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae2
- Treatment
- seep mulching plastice2
- Outcome
- dry material accumulatione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- ordinary polyethylene plastice2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the dry material accumulation increased”
e2“selecting the seep mulching plastic,compared with the ordinary polyethylene plastic,on the maintenance test in peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Seep mulching plastic reduced cell membrane relative penetrability in peanut compared with ordinary polyethylene plastic.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae2
- Treatment
- seep mulching plastice2
- Outcome
- cell membrane relative penetrabilitye0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- ordinary polyethylene plastice2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the cell membrane relative penetrability reduced”
e2“selecting the seep mulching plastic,compared with the ordinary polyethylene plastic,on the maintenance test in peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Seep mulching plastic enhanced resistance in peanut compared with ordinary polyethylene plastic.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae2
- Treatment
- seep mulching plastice2
- Outcome
- resistancee0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- ordinary polyethylene plastice2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the resistance enhanced”
e2“selecting the seep mulching plastic,compared with the ordinary polyethylene plastic,on the maintenance test in peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Seep mulching plastic increased peanut pod yield by 9.8% compared with ordinary mulching plastic cultivation.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae2
- Treatment
- seep mulching plastice2
- Outcome
- pod fruit productione1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 9.8%e1
- Comparator
- ordinary mulching plastic cultivatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the pod fruit production increased 9.8% than the ordinary mulching plastic cultivation and 65.4% than the open ground”
e2“selecting the seep mulching plastic,compared with the ordinary polyethylene plastic,on the maintenance test in peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Seep mulching plastic increased peanut pod yield by 65.4% compared with open ground.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae2
- Treatment
- seep mulching plastice2
- Outcome
- pod fruit productione1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 65.4%e1
- Comparator
- open grounde1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the pod fruit production increased 9.8% than the ordinary mulching plastic cultivation and 65.4% than the open ground”
e2“selecting the seep mulching plastic,compared with the ordinary polyethylene plastic,on the maintenance test in peanut”
The same questions in other papers
mulching · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →mulching · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
mulching · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
mulching · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →mulching · physiology: photosynthesis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.