Paper · 2004 · T'u Jang T'ung Pao

Physiological—biological Changes of Legumes under Drought Stress

Yu Ni

5
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The physiological-biochemical changes of three legume varieties were determined in May and August under drought stress in a green house. The results showed that two Medicago sativa varieties (Eureka and Defi) were the best in drought resistance among allselected varieties and the Eureka was better than the Defi. The drought resistance between Lotus corniculatus and two trifolium repens (Huia and Revendel) was different in May and August. T.repens was better than L.corniculatus in May, while they showed opposite in August because of the rapid growth of L.corniculatus in the late period. The Huia was better than the Revendel.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medicago sativa varieties Eureka and Defi were the best in drought resistance among all selected varieties.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Eureka and Defie1
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
drought resistancee1
Direction
the beste1
Comparator
allselected varietiese1
Setting
green housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Changes of Legumes under Drought Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“under drought stress in a green house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that two Medicago sativa varieties (Eureka and Defi) were the best in drought resistance among allselected varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medicago sativa variety Eureka had better drought resistance than Defi.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Eurekae2
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
drought resistancee1
Direction
bettere2
Comparator
Defie2
Setting
green housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Changes of Legumes under Drought Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“under drought stress in a green house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that two Medicago sativa varieties (Eureka and Defi) were the best in drought resistance among allselected varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–272 · show in text ↑
e2

“and the Eureka was better than the Defi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In May, Trifolium repens had better drought resistance than Lotus corniculatus.

Taxon
T.repense3
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
drought resistancee4
Direction
bettere3
Qualifier
in Maye3
Comparator
L.corniculatuse3
Setting
green housee0

Verbatim

t0

“Changes of Legumes under Drought Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“under drought stress in a green house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e3

“T.repens was better than L.corniculatus in May”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–488 · show in text ↑
e4

“The drought resistance between Lotus corniculatus and two trifolium repens (Huia and Revendel) was different in May and August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In August, Lotus corniculatus had better drought resistance than Trifolium repens, because of its rapid late-season growth.

Taxon
L.corniculatusLotus corniculatuse5
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
drought resistancee4
Direction
higherinferrede5
Qualifier
because of the rapid growth of L.corniculatus in the late periode5
Comparator
T.repense5
Setting
green housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus corniculatus
Lotus corniculatus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Changes of Legumes under Drought Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“under drought stress in a green house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e4

“The drought resistance between Lotus corniculatus and two trifolium repens (Huia and Revendel) was different in May and August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–440 · show in text ↑
e5

“T.repens was better than L.corniculatus in May, while they showed opposite in August because of the rapid growth of L.corniculatus in the late period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifolium repens cultivar Huia had better drought resistance than Revendel.

Taxon
trifolium repensTrifolium repense4
Material
Huiae6
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
drought resistancee4
Direction
bettere6
Comparator
Revendele6
Setting
green housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Changes of Legumes under Drought Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“under drought stress in a green house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e4

“The drought resistance between Lotus corniculatus and two trifolium repens (Huia and Revendel) was different in May and August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–440 · show in text ↑
e6

“The Huia was better than the Revendel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–630 · show in text ↑

drought · tolerance: abiotic · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · tolerance: abiotic · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.