Paper · 2007 · Liaoning nongye kexue

Effect of Shading on Rice Qualities of Different Panicle Types

Zhang Li-li

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Four keng rice varieties with different panicle types and rice qualities were tested in field.Some plots were shaded from heading stage.In this paper,the author had a contrast analysis about shading effects on qualities.The integral polished rice rate of the high rice quality erect panicle type Liaojing 294 was higher than not shading treatment in process quality.Shading treatment lead to short grain in Liaokai 79-3 and babala which rice quality were sleazy,little effects on high rice quality Liaojing 294 and Liaojing 371,no effects on rice shape in appearance quality.Shading treatment increase chalky rice rate,chalky area and chalky degree on which curved panicle types and high quality varieties were apparent in chalky quality.Shading treatment increase protein and make a reduction in amylase on which erect panicle types were apparent in nurture quality shading treatment made a reduction in flavor quality in erect panicle type and uncertainty in curved one.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading raised the integral polished rice rate of Liaojing 294 compared with no shading.

Material
Liaojing 294e0
Outcome
integral polished rice ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
not shading treatmente0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The integral polished rice rate of the high rice quality erect panicle type Liaojing 294 was higher than not shading treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading shortened grain in Liaokai 79-3.

Material
Liaokai 79-3e0
Treatment
Shading treatmente0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
shorte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading treatment lead to short grain in Liaokai 79-3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–419 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading shortened grain in babala.

Material
babalae0
Treatment
Shading treatmente0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
shorte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading treatment lead to short grain in Liaokai 79-3 and babala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading had little effect on grain shape in Liaojing 294.

Material
Liaojing 294e0
Outcome
rice shapee1
Direction
little effectse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“little effects on high rice quality Liaojing 294 and Liaojing 371”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–527 · show in text ↑
e1

“no effects on rice shape in appearance quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading had little effect on grain shape in Liaojing 371.

Material
Liaojing 371e0
Outcome
rice shapee1
Direction
little effectse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“little effects on high rice quality Liaojing 294 and Liaojing 371”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–527 · show in text ↑
e1

“no effects on rice shape in appearance quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading increased chalky rice rate, chalky area, and chalky degree, especially for curved-panicle and high-quality varieties.

Treatment
Shading treatmente0
Outcome
chalky rice rate,chalky area and chalky degreee0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
curved panicle types and high quality varietiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading treatment increase chalky rice rate,chalky area and chalky degree on which curved panicle types and high quality varieties were apparent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading increased rice protein content, particularly in erect-panicle types.

Treatment
Shading treatmente0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
erect panicle typese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading treatment increase protein and make a reduction in amylase on which erect panicle types were apparent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading reduced rice amylase, particularly in erect-panicle types.

Treatment
Shading treatmente0
Outcome
amylasee0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
erect panicle typese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading treatment increase protein and make a reduction in amylase on which erect panicle types were apparent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading reduced flavor quality in erect-panicle rice.

Treatment
shading treatmente0
Outcome
flavor qualitye0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
erect panicle typee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shading treatment made a reduction in flavor quality in erect panicle type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of shading on flavor quality in curved-panicle rice was uncertain.

Treatment
shading treatmente1
Outcome
flavor qualitye1
Direction
uncertaintye0
Qualifier
curved onee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uncertainty in curved one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–971 · show in text ↑
e1

“shading treatment made a reduction in flavor quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–25 · show in text ↑

shade · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

shade · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 15 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

shade · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.