Paper · 2012

Effect of N,P and K balanced fertilization on sugar beet

Gu Wei

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

According to the 3414 experimental design scheme of fertilizer effects,the application effect and interactions of nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium on sugar beet were studied,The results showed that the fertilizing amounts and proportion of N,P and K fertilizer were important factors which affected sugar beet yield.The highest yield rate was 56.0%,13.51% and 10.64%,respectively,by fertilizing N,P and K.According to the nutrient efficiency,the fertilizer application of N,P,K at medium level had the best effect;there were interactions among N,P and K fertilizer,coordinated applications of N,P and K fertilizer could improve fertilizer efficiency and promote sugar beet growth,the nutrient dosage of medium level was propitious to various nutrient effect exertion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizing amounts and the proportion of N, P and K fertilizer were important factors affecting sugar beet yield.

Treatment
fertilizing amounts and proportion of N,P and K fertilizere1
Outcome
sugar beet yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilizing amounts and proportion of N,P and K fertilizer were important factors which affected sugar beet yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizing with N gave the highest yield rate, 56.0%.

Treatment
fertilizing N,P and Ke2
Outcome
yield ratee2
Direction
higheste2
Value
56.0%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield rate was 56.0%,13.51% and 10.64%,respectively,by fertilizing N,P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizing with P gave the highest yield rate, 13.51%.

Treatment
fertilizing N,P and Ke2
Outcome
yield ratee2
Direction
higheste2
Value
13.51%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield rate was 56.0%,13.51% and 10.64%,respectively,by fertilizing N,P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizing with K gave the highest yield rate, 10.64%.

Treatment
fertilizing N,P and Ke2
Outcome
yield ratee2
Direction
higheste2
Value
10.64%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield rate was 56.0%,13.51% and 10.64%,respectively,by fertilizing N,P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium-level application of N, P and K fertilizer had the best nutrient efficiency.

Treatment
fertilizer application of N,P,K at medium levele3
Outcome
nutrient efficiencye3
Direction
beste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e3

“According to the nutrient efficiency, the fertilizer application of N,P,K at medium level had the best effect”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 402–510 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N, P and K fertilizer interacted in their effects on sugar beet.

Treatment
N,P and K fertilizere4
Outcome
interactions among N,P and K fertilizere4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e4

“there were interactions among N,P and K fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coordinated N, P and K applications could improve fertilizer efficiency.

Treatment
coordinated applications of N,P and K fertilizere5
Outcome
fertilizer efficiencye5
Direction
improvee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e5

“coordinated applications of N,P and K fertilizer could improve fertilizer efficiency and promote sugar beet growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coordinated N, P and K applications could promote sugar beet growth.

Treatment
coordinated applications of N,P and K fertilizere5
Outcome
sugar beet growthe5
Direction
promotee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e5

“coordinated applications of N,P and K fertilizer could improve fertilizer efficiency and promote sugar beet growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A medium nutrient dosage was propitious to various nutrient effect exertion.

Treatment
the nutrient dosage of medium levele6
Outcome
various nutrient effect exertione6
Direction
propitiouse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e6

“the nutrient dosage of medium level was propitious to various nutrient effect exertion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–763 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

potassium · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

58 papers: 52 positive, 6 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

potassium · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 36 positive, 4 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.