Paper · 2003 · Zhiwu yichuan ziyuan xuebao

Methods for Identifying Drought Resistance at Germination Stage of Wheat by Osmotic Stress

Xiaoping Chang

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-6000, mannitol and sucrose were employed as osmotica for simulating water stress to identify drought resistance at germination stage of wheat. Three osmotica with osmotic potential from -0.25MPa to 1.50MPa were compared. Germinal bud growth in sucrose was inhibited because of molding and stress. Germinal bud elongation was inhibited in -0.25MPa PEG-6000 and -0.50MPa mannitol. Germination percentage significantly decreased in -0.50MPa PEG-6000 and -1.00MPa mannitol. Both of germination percentage and germinal bud length decreased with the increase of osmotic stress because the speed of water absorbing by grains was slow in osmotic stress solutions, and further resulted in lower grain relative water content (RWC) and lower osmotic potential than in water. All parameters associated with germination decreased more seriously in PEG-6000 than in mannitol at the same osmotic potential. For the purpose of evaluating drought resistance of wheat genotypes by identifying germination percentage in osmotic stress solution, -0.50MPa PEG-6000 or -1.00MPa mannitol is ideal, but -0.50MPa PEG-6000 should be preferred if the experiment cost is considered.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose inhibited germinal bud growth through molding and stress.

Treatment
sucrosee0
Outcome
Germinal bud growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germinal bud growth in sucrose was inhibited because of molding and stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG-6000 at -0.25MPa inhibited germinal bud elongation.

Treatment
-0.25MPa PEG-6000e0
Outcome
Germinal bud elongatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germinal bud elongation was inhibited in -0.25MPa PEG-6000 and -0.50MPa mannitol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mannitol at -0.50MPa inhibited germinal bud elongation.

Treatment
-0.50MPa mannitole0
Outcome
Germinal bud elongatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germinal bud elongation was inhibited in -0.25MPa PEG-6000 and -0.50MPa mannitol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG-6000 at -0.50MPa significantly decreased germination percentage.

Treatment
-0.50MPa PEG-6000e0
Outcome
Germination percentagee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germination percentage significantly decreased in -0.50MPa PEG-6000 and -1.00MPa mannitol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mannitol at -1.00MPa significantly decreased germination percentage.

Treatment
-1.00MPa mannitole0
Outcome
Germination percentagee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Germination percentage significantly decreased in -0.50MPa PEG-6000 and -1.00MPa mannitol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–495 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination percentage and germinal bud length decreased as osmotic stress increased.

Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
germination percentage and germinal bud lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both of germination percentage and germinal bud length decreased with the increase of osmotic stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–596 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic stress slowed water absorption by grains and lowered grain relative water content and osmotic potential relative to water.

Treatment
osmotic stress solutionse0
Outcome
grain relative water content (RWC) and lower osmotic potentiale0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
speed of water absorbing by grains was slowe0
Comparator
watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“because the speed of water absorbing by grains was slow in osmotic stress solutions, and further resulted in lower grain relative water content (RWC) and lower osmotic potential than in water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination parameters decreased more in PEG-6000 than mannitol at the same osmotic potential.

Treatment
PEG-6000e0
Outcome
parameters associated with germinatione0
Direction
decreased more seriouslye0
Qualifier
at the same osmotic potentiale0
Comparator
mannitole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“All parameters associated with germination decreased more seriously in PEG-6000 than in mannitol at the same osmotic potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–917 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend -0.50MPa PEG-6000 or -1.00MPa mannitol for screening wheat drought resistance by germination percentage, preferring PEG-6000 if cost matters.

Outcome
-0.50MPa PEG-6000 or -1.00MPa mannitol is ideale0
Qualifier
if the experiment cost is considerede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“For the purpose of evaluating drought resistance of wheat genotypes by identifying germination percentage in osmotic stress solution, -0.50MPa PEG-6000 or -1.00MPa mannitol is ideal, but -0.50MPa PEG-6000 should be preferred if the experiment cost is considered.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1180 · show in text ↑

mannitol · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 2 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

sucrose · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.