Abstract
We adjusted plant by early-senescence prevention pruning way and conventional single stem pruning way, and studied effects of these ways on single fruit weight, commercial fruit rate, lycopene content, vitamin C content and root vitality. The results showed that, compared with conventional single stem pruning way, early-senescence prevention pruning way had obvious superiority in yield and quality, which provide a reasonable pruning way for tomato production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Early-senescence prevention pruning had obvious superiority in tomato yield and quality over conventional single-stem pruning.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- early-senescence prevention pruning waye0
- Outcome
- yield and qualitye0
- Direction
- obvious superioritye0
- Comparator
- conventional single stem pruning waye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared with conventional single stem pruning way, early-senescence prevention pruning way had obvious superiority in yield and quality”
t0“Yield and Quality of Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Early-senescence prevention pruning is a reasonable pruning way for tomato production.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Outcome
- a reasonable pruning way for tomato productione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“which provide a reasonable pruning way for tomato production”
t0“Yield and Quality of Tomato”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.