Paper · 2012 · Zhongguo shengtai nongye xuebao

Determination of BTH-induced wheat resistance to Puccinia striiformis

Han Qing

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Stripe rust,caused by Puccinia striiformis f.sp.tritici(Pst),is one of the most damaging wheat plant diseases across the globe.Exploration of resistant cultivars is one of the most economic and preferred control methods of stripe rust diseases.Wheat resistance to stripe rust fungi could easily be lost due to rapid virulent variations in Pst races.Benzothiadiazole(BTH),a novel and powerful elicitor,could induce systemic acquired resistance(SAR) in plants.So far no report has focused on BTH-induced wheat resistance to stripe rust fungi at maturity growth stage.Hence in this study,wheat cultivars of Huixianhong seedlings and 97148 mature wheat plants were pre-treated with BTH and inoculated with Pst race CYR23.Disease index and control efficiencies evaluations indicated improvements in wheat resistance to Pst and induction of SAR by BTH.In Huixianhong wheat seedlings,resistance to Pst significantly increased and stripe rust disease index reduced by 29.69~49.77.Meanwhile stripe rust disease control efficiency in Huixianhong wheat seedlings after BTH treatment reached 90%.Optimum concentration and time interval of BTH pre-treatment tests also showed that 0.3 mmol?L?1 of BTH concentration and 6~7 days intervals between BTH treatment and Pst inoculation were the best.Furthermore,BTH-induced wheat resistance to Pst was noted to last at least 15 days after Pst inoculation.Mature 97148 wheat cultivar sprayed with different concentrations(0.1~1.0 mmol?L?1) of BTH showed nominal fluctuations in disease index,but with much stronger wheat resistance to Pst.Meanwhile grain yield of 0.3 mmol?L?1 BTH-treated plants reached 675.32 kg?667m?2,which was 19.3% higher than the control.The results also indicated that BTH sprayed at different wheat growth stages(e.g.,tillering,pre-jointing and tillering/pre-jointing) had no influence on the efficiency of BTH-induced wheat resistance to Pst.Compared to the control,however,BTH treatment impacted disease index of Pst and grain yield of wheat at each different growth stage.Due to stronger seedling assays,BTH-induced wheat resistance to Pst in mature plants lasted at least 60 days.In conclusion therefore,the study demonstrated that BTH induced wheat resistance to stripe rust fungi at both seedling and maturity stages.This finding was significant in controlling stripe rust disease of wheat and other field crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH increased seedling resistance to Pst significantly.

Material
Huixianhonge0
Treatment
BTHe1
Interactor
Pste0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to Pste0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Huixianhong wheat seedlings,resistance to Pst significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–918 · show in text ↑
e1

“pre-treated with BTH and inoculated with Pst race CYR23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH reduced seedling stripe rust disease index by 29.69~49.77.

Material
Huixianhonge0
Treatment
BTHe1
Interactor
Pste2pathogen
Outcome
stripe rust disease indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
29.69~49.77e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Huixianhong wheat seedlings,resistance to Pst significantly increased and stripe rust disease index reduced by 29.69~49.77”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–971 · show in text ↑
e1

“pre-treated with BTH and inoculated with Pst race CYR23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–716 · show in text ↑
e2

“stripe rust,caused by Puccinia striiformis f.sp.tritici(Pst)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH control efficiency against seedling stripe rust reached 90%.

Material
Huixianhonge0
Treatment
BTHe0
Interactor
Pste1pathogen
Outcome
stripe rust disease control efficiencye0
Direction
reachede0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stripe rust disease control efficiency in Huixianhong wheat seedlings after BTH treatment reached 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1083 · show in text ↑
e1

“stripe rust,caused by Puccinia striiformis f.sp.tritici(Pst)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best pretreatment was 0.3 mmol?L?1 BTH with a 6~7 day interval.

Treatment
BTHe0
Interactor
Pste0pathogen
Outcome
beste0
Value
0.3 mmol?L?1e0
Qualifier
6~7 days intervalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.3 mmol?L?1 of BTH concentration and 6~7 days intervals between BTH treatment and Pst inoculation were the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1280 · show in text ↑
e1

“BTH-induced wheat resistance to Pst was noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1338 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH-induced resistance persisted at least 15 days after inoculation.

Treatment
BTHe0
Interactor
Pste0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to Pste0
Value
at least 15 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BTH-induced wheat resistance to Pst was noted to last at least 15 days after Pst inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mature 97148 wheat sprayed with BTH showed nominal disease-index fluctuations and stronger Pst resistance.

Material
97148e0
Treatment
BTHe0
Interactor
Pste0pathogen
Outcome
wheat resistance to Pste0
Direction
strongere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mature 97148 wheat cultivar sprayed with different concentrations(0.1~1.0 mmol?L?1) of BTH showed nominal fluctuations in disease index,but with much stronger wheat resistance to Pst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH-treated mature wheat yielded 675.32 kg?667m?2, 19.3% above control.

Material
97148e1
Treatment
0.3 mmol?L?1 BTHe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
675.32 kg?667m?2e0
Qualifier
19.3%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield of 0.3 mmol?L?1 BTH-treated plants reached 675.32 kg?667m?2,which was 19.3% higher than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1690 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mature 97148 wheat cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth stage of BTH spraying did not affect induced Pst resistance efficiency.

Treatment
BTH sprayed at different wheat growth stagese0
Interactor
Pste0pathogen
Outcome
efficiency of BTH-induced wheat resistance to Pste0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BTH sprayed at different wheat growth stages(e.g.,tillering,pre-jointing and tillering/pre-jointing) had no influence on the efficiency of BTH-induced wheat resistance to Pst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH affected Pst disease index across wheat growth stages.

Treatment
BTH treatmente0
Interactor
Pste0pathogen
Outcome
disease index of Pste0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control,however,BTH treatment impacted disease index of Pst and grain yield of wheat at each different growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1898–2029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH affected wheat grain yield across growth stages.

Treatment
BTH treatmente0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control,however,BTH treatment impacted disease index of Pst and grain yield of wheat at each different growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1898–2029 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH-induced resistance in mature wheat lasted at least 60 days.

Interactor
Pste0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to Pste0
Value
at least 60 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BTH-induced wheat resistance to Pst in mature plants lasted at least 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2062–2138 · show in text ↑

acibenzolar-S-methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

acibenzolar-S-methyl · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

stage · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 9 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.