Abstract
Taking cut flower Gerbera jamesonii 'Solar wind' rootless plantlets as test materials,vermiculite,perlite∶peat=2∶1,perlite and peat=1∶1 as matrix,after 25 days later,the number of the leaves,the roots and the length of the roots were investigated,the effect of the different hormone concentrations on the plantlets rooting were analyzed,and the suitable matrix were selected.The results showed that every hormone could promote rooting;there was a significant difference in average of root number,difference in the length of the roots,however there was no difference in the number of leaves.According to the growth status,the vermiculite was selected as the optimum matrix,the optimum hormone was IBA 500 mg/L+NAA 500 mg/L,the second IBA 500 mg/L.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Each hormone promoted plantlet rooting.
- Taxon
- Gerbera jamesonii
Gerbera jamesoniie0 - Material
- Solar winde0
- Treatment
- every hormonee1
- Outcome
- rootinge1
- Direction
- promotee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Gerbera jamesonii 'Solar wind' rootless plantlets”
e1“every hormone could promote rooting”
Claim · model-written summary
Hormone treatments differed significantly in average root number.
- Taxon
- Gerbera jamesoniiGerbera jamesoniie0
- Outcome
- average of root numbere1
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Gerbera jamesonii”
e1“there was a significant difference in average of root number”
Claim · model-written summary
Hormone treatments differed in root length.
- Taxon
- Gerbera jamesoniiGerbera jamesoniie0
- Outcome
- length of the rootse1
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Gerbera jamesonii”
e1“difference in the length of the roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Hormone treatments did not differ in leaf number.
- Taxon
- Gerbera jamesoniiGerbera jamesoniie0
- Outcome
- number of leavese1
- Direction
- no differencee1
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Gerbera jamesonii”
e1“there was no difference in the number of leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermiculite was selected as the optimum matrix.
- Taxon
- Gerbera jamesoniiGerbera jamesoniie0
- Outcome
- vermiculite was selected as the optimum matrixe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Gerbera jamesonii”
e1“the vermiculite was selected as the optimum matrix”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA 500 mg/L plus NAA 500 mg/L was selected as the optimum hormone treatment.
- Taxon
- Gerbera jamesoniiGerbera jamesoniie0
- Treatment
- IBA 500 mg/L+NAA 500 mg/Le1
- Outcome
- optimum hormonee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Gerbera jamesonii”
e1“the optimum hormone was IBA 500 mg/L+NAA 500 mg/L”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA 500 mg/L ranked second.
- Taxon
- Gerbera jamesoniiGerbera jamesoniie0
- Outcome
- the second IBA 500 mg/Le1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Gerbera jamesonii”
e1“the second IBA 500 mg/L”
The same questions in other papers
class · growth · Gerbera jamesonii (Transvaal daisy)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.