Paper · 2002 · PubMed

[Eco-toxicology of heavy metals on the inhibition of seed germination and root elongation of wheat in soils].

Yufang Song; Qixing Zhou; Huaxia Xu; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The eco-toxicity of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd in the single form was tested with four types of soils(red loam soils, meadow brown soils, chestnut soils, and dark brown soils) and their combined effect was determined with meadow brown soils. The results showed that with the same content of heavy metals, the root elongation was strongly inhabited than the seed germination, and it indicated that root was more sensitive to heavy metals pollution. The inhibition rate of heavy metals pollution on the root elongation (IRHMRE) of wheat was significantly related with the contents of organic matter (OR) and Kjedahl-nitrogen (K-N) in soils (R2OR = 0.91, R2K-N = 0.92). However, IRHMRE was not significantly related with soil pH as did with OR and K-N, so does the content of CEC (R2pH = 0.62, R2CEC = 0.60). Whether under the low concentration of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd resulted in an irritated effect in root elongation, or under high concentration resulted in an inhibition effect in the single form, an synergistic effect occurred in the combined form.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At equal heavy metal content, wheat root elongation was more inhibited than seed germination.

Treatment
heavy metalse0
Outcome
root elongatione0
Direction
strongly inhabitede0
Comparator
seed germinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the same content of heavy metals, the root elongation was strongly inhabited than the seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–365 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat root elongation inhibition was significantly related to soil organic matter.

Outcome
inhibition rate of heavy metals pollution on the root elongatione0
Qualifier
R2OR = 0.91e0
Setting
soilse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition rate of heavy metals pollution on the root elongation (IRHMRE) of wheat was significantly related with the contents of organic matter (OR) and Kjedahl-nitrogen (K-N) in soils (R2OR = 0.91, R2K-N = 0.92).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–658 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat root elongation inhibition was significantly related to soil Kjedahl nitrogen.

Outcome
inhibition rate of heavy metals pollution on the root elongatione0
Qualifier
R2K-N = 0.92e0
Setting
soilse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition rate of heavy metals pollution on the root elongation (IRHMRE) of wheat was significantly related with the contents of organic matter (OR) and Kjedahl-nitrogen (K-N) in soils (R2OR = 0.91, R2K-N = 0.92).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–658 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat root elongation inhibition was not significantly related to soil pH.

Outcome
IRHMREe0
Qualifier
R2pH = 0.62e0
Setting
soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IRHMRE was not significantly related with soil pH as did with OR and K-N, so does the content of CEC (R2pH = 0.62, R2CEC = 0.60).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat root elongation inhibition was not significantly related to CEC.

Outcome
IRHMREe0
Qualifier
R2CEC = 0.60e0
Setting
soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IRHMRE was not significantly related with soil pH as did with OR and K-N, so does the content of CEC (R2pH = 0.62, R2CEC = 0.60).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low concentrations of individual heavy metals stimulated wheat root elongation.

Treatment
low concentration of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cde0
Outcome
root elongatione0
Direction
irritated effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the low concentration of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd resulted in an irritated effect in root elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High concentrations of individual heavy metals inhibited wheat root elongation.

Treatment
high concentratione0
Outcome
root elongatione0
Direction
inhibition effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whether under the low concentration of Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd resulted in an irritated effect in root elongation, or under high concentration resulted in an inhibition effect in the single form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined heavy metals had a synergistic effect on wheat root elongation.

Treatment
combined forme0
Outcome
synergistic effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an synergistic effect occurred in the combined form.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑

lead atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 4 positive, 26 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

copper atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

61 papers: 31 positive, 30 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

cadmium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

110 papers: 20 positive, 90 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 90 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

heavy metal · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

53 papers: 8 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.