Abstract
The experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of konjac and maize intercropping on the soft rot of Amorphophallus Konjac and the metabolic functional diversity of Konjac rhizosphere microbial community by biolog ECO microplates.The results showed that Konjac and maize intercropping could effectively suppress the disease,the T3 treatment(maize 2∶Konjac 4) had the highest control efficiency which reached to 61.27%.In addition,Shannon diversity,Shannon evenness and the average well color development(AWCD) were influenced by intercropping;the ability of utilizing carbon source of Konjac rhizosphere microbe varied in different treatments of intercropping,the variation of T3 was significant among all the treatments.Compared with Konjac monoculture(CK),the abilities of utilizing polymers and phenolic compounds of T3 raised 25.7% and 23.5%,respectively;however,the abilities of utilizing carbohydrates,carboxylic acids,amino acids and amines of T3 reduced 30.7%,39.9%,34.9% and 38.6%,respectively.The results of principal components analysis(PCA) showed an obvious difference of the metabolic functional diversity between intercropping and Konjac monoculture.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Konjac–maize intercropping suppressed konjac soft rot.
- Taxon
- Konjac
Amorphophallus konjace0 - Treatment
- Konjac and maize intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- the diseasee0
- Direction
- suppresse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Konjac and maize intercropping could effectively suppress the disease”
Claim · model-written summary
The T3 maize–konjac intercrop had the highest disease control efficiency, 61.27%.
- Taxon
- KonjacAmorphophallus konjace0
- Treatment
- T3 treatment(maize 2∶Konjac 4)e0
- Outcome
- control efficiencye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 61.27%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the T3 treatment(maize 2∶Konjac 4) had the highest control efficiency which reached to 61.27%”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping influenced Konjac rhizosphere Shannon diversity, evenness and AWCD.
- Taxon
- KonjacAmorphophallus konjact0
- Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- Shannon diversity,Shannon evenness and the average well color development(AWCD)e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shannon diversity,Shannon evenness and the average well color development(AWCD) were influenced by intercropping”
t0“Metabolic Functional Diversity of Konjac Rhizosphere”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbon source use by Konjac rhizosphere microbes varied among intercrop treatments, with significant T3 variation.
- Taxon
- KonjacAmorphophallus konjace0
- Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- ability of utilizing carbon source of Konjac rhizosphere microbee0
- Qualifier
- the variation of T3 was significante0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the ability of utilizing carbon source of Konjac rhizosphere microbe varied in different treatments of intercropping,the variation of T3 was significant among all the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 intercropping raised Konjac rhizosphere microbial use of polymers by 25.7% versus monoculture.
- Taxon
- KonjacAmorphophallus konjace0
- Treatment
- T3e0
- Outcome
- polymerse0
- Direction
- raisede0
- Value
- 25.7%e0
- Comparator
- Konjac monoculture(CK)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with Konjac monoculture(CK),the abilities of utilizing polymers and phenolic compounds of T3 raised 25.7% and 23.5%,respectively;however,the abilities of utilizing carbohydrates,carboxylic acids,amino acids and amines of T3 reduced 30.7%,39.9%,34.9% and 38.6%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 intercropping raised Konjac rhizosphere microbial use of phenolic compounds by 23.5% versus monoculture.
- Taxon
- KonjacAmorphophallus konjace0
- Treatment
- T3e0
- Outcome
- phenolic compoundse0
- Direction
- raisede0
- Value
- 23.5%e0
- Comparator
- Konjac monoculture(CK)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with Konjac monoculture(CK),the abilities of utilizing polymers and phenolic compounds of T3 raised 25.7% and 23.5%,respectively;however,the abilities of utilizing carbohydrates,carboxylic acids,amino acids and amines of T3 reduced 30.7%,39.9%,34.9% and 38.6%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 intercropping reduced Konjac rhizosphere microbial use of carbohydrates by 30.7% versus monoculture.
- Taxon
- KonjacAmorphophallus konjace0
- Treatment
- T3e0
- Outcome
- carbohydratese0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 30.7%e0
- Comparator
- Konjac monoculture(CK)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with Konjac monoculture(CK),the abilities of utilizing polymers and phenolic compounds of T3 raised 25.7% and 23.5%,respectively;however,the abilities of utilizing carbohydrates,carboxylic acids,amino acids and amines of T3 reduced 30.7%,39.9%,34.9% and 38.6%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 intercropping reduced Konjac rhizosphere microbial use of carboxylic acids by 39.9% versus monoculture.
- Taxon
- KonjacAmorphophallus konjace0
- Treatment
- T3e0
- Outcome
- carboxylic acidse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 39.9%e0
- Comparator
- Konjac monoculture(CK)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with Konjac monoculture(CK),the abilities of utilizing polymers and phenolic compounds of T3 raised 25.7% and 23.5%,respectively;however,the abilities of utilizing carbohydrates,carboxylic acids,amino acids and amines of T3 reduced 30.7%,39.9%,34.9% and 38.6%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 intercropping reduced Konjac rhizosphere microbial use of amino acids by 34.9% versus monoculture.
- Taxon
- KonjacAmorphophallus konjace0
- Treatment
- T3e0
- Outcome
- amino acidse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 34.9%e0
- Comparator
- Konjac monoculture(CK)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with Konjac monoculture(CK),the abilities of utilizing polymers and phenolic compounds of T3 raised 25.7% and 23.5%,respectively;however,the abilities of utilizing carbohydrates,carboxylic acids,amino acids and amines of T3 reduced 30.7%,39.9%,34.9% and 38.6%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 intercropping reduced Konjac rhizosphere microbial use of amines by 38.6% versus monoculture.
- Taxon
- KonjacAmorphophallus konjace0
- Treatment
- T3e0
- Outcome
- aminese0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 38.6%e0
- Comparator
- Konjac monoculture(CK)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with Konjac monoculture(CK),the abilities of utilizing polymers and phenolic compounds of T3 raised 25.7% and 23.5%,respectively;however,the abilities of utilizing carbohydrates,carboxylic acids,amino acids and amines of T3 reduced 30.7%,39.9%,34.9% and 38.6%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
PCA distinguished intercropped Konjac rhizosphere metabolic diversity from monoculture.
- Taxon
- KonjacAmorphophallus konjace0
- Outcome
- metabolic functional diversitye0
- Comparator
- Konjac monoculturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“an obvious difference of the metabolic functional diversity between intercropping and Konjac monoculture”
The same questions in other papers
Zea mays · disease · Amorphophallus konjac (konjac)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
intercropping · disease · Amorphophallus konjac (konjac)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.