Paper · 2008 · Journal of Changjiang Vegetables

Effect of Different Coverage on Plug Seedling Growth and Quantity of Cucumber

Junqin Chen

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of different coverage on plug seedling growth and quantity in industrialize production in cucumber were studied. The results showed that sand as the coverage has more germination ratio, G-value, index of strong seedling, chlorophyl content than CK (nutrition substrate), and other indexes are nearly the same, the cost decreased by 18.46%. If it is used more in industrialize production, it will provide great economic benefit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

sand as the coverage has more germination ratio, G-value, index of strong seedling, chlorophyl content than CK (nutrition substrate)

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
sand as the coveragee0
Outcome
germination ratio, G-value, index of strong seedlinge0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
CK (nutrition substrate)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sand as the coverage has more germination ratio, G-value, index of strong seedling, chlorophyl content than CK (nutrition substrate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

sand as the coverage has more germination ratio, G-value, index of strong seedling, chlorophyl content than CK (nutrition substrate)

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
sand as the coveragee0
Outcome
chlorophyl contente0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
CK (nutrition substrate)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sand as the coverage has more germination ratio, G-value, index of strong seedling, chlorophyl content than CK (nutrition substrate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

and other indexes are nearly the same

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
sand as the coveragee1
Outcome
other indexese0
Direction
nearly the samee0
Comparator
CK (nutrition substrate)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and other indexes are nearly the same”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–319 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“sand as the coverage has more germination ratio, G-value, index of strong seedling, chlorophyl content than CK (nutrition substrate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

the cost decreased by 18.46%

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
sand as the coveragee1
Outcome
coste0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
18.46%e0
Comparator
CK (nutrition substrate)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cost decreased by 18.46%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“sand as the coverage has more germination ratio, G-value, index of strong seedling, chlorophyl content than CK (nutrition substrate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–280 · show in text ↑

growing medium · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

growing medium · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

growing medium · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.