Abstract
The grain yield(GY), protein content(PC), and protein yield(PY) of winter wheat in different bands spacing, and their relationships between each other were studied with winter wheat varity of Yumai 34. The results showed that band spacing took hadlsingificant effect on the wheat PY and GY, but no effect on the PC; PY had significant relationship with GY, and no close relationship with PC.Linear regression relationship exists between PY(Y) and GY(X):Y=106 809+0 107X(kg·hm -2 ); GY was the highest at 2 0m band spacing,The marginal effect was the greatest and better benefit will be gotten with relaying intercropping in 2\^4m band spacing.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Band spacing significantly affected wheat protein yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- band spacinge0
- Outcome
- wheat PYe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“band spacing took hadlsingificant effect on the wheat PY and GY”
Claim · model-written summary
Band spacing significantly affected wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- band spacinge0
- Outcome
- GYe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“band spacing took hadlsingificant effect on the wheat PY and GY”
Claim · model-written summary
Band spacing had no effect on wheat protein content.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- band spacinge0
- Outcome
- PCe0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“band spacing took hadlsingificant effect on the wheat PY and GY, but no effect on the PC”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein yield was significantly related to grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- PYe0
- Comparator
- GYe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PY had significant relationship with GY”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein yield had no close relationship with protein content.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- PYe0
- Comparator
- PCe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PY had significant relationship with GY, and no close relationship with PC”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein yield and grain yield had a linear regression relationship.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- PY(Y)e0
- Value
- Y=106 809+0 107X(kg·hm -2 )e0
- Comparator
- GY(X)e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Linear regression relationship exists between PY(Y) and GY(X):Y=106 809+0 107X(kg·hm -2 )”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield was highest at 2 0m band spacing.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 2 0m band spacinge0
- Outcome
- GYe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“GY was the highest at 2 0m band spacing”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The largest marginal effect and better benefit were reported for relaying intercropping at 2\^4m band spacing.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- relaying intercropping in 2\^4m band spacinge0
- Outcome
- marginal effecte0
- Direction
- greateste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The marginal effect was the greatest and better benefit will be gotten with relaying intercropping in 2\^4m band spacing”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
density · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.