Paper · 2007 · Shanghai nongye xuebao

The effect of different planting methods on growth of edible perfume plants

Yongkang Yao

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Several different edible perfume plants were cultured in both organic substrate and soil,and their yields,plant heights,expansions, leaf areas and aromas were measured.The result showed that the plants cultured in organic substrate grew better and had a higher yield than those cultured in soil,and especially in growth prophase,the plants cultured in organic substrate had a higher growth rate and a richer aroma.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants in organic substrate grew better than those in soil.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
organic substratee0
Outcome
grew bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
soile0

Verbatim

e0

“plants cultured in organic substrate grew better and had a higher yield than those cultured in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–294 · show in text ↑
t0

“edible perfume plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants in organic substrate had higher yield than those in soil.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
organic substratee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
soile0

Verbatim

e0

“plants cultured in organic substrate grew better and had a higher yield than those cultured in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–294 · show in text ↑
t0

“edible perfume plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic substrate gave higher early growth rate than soil.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
organic substratee0
Outcome
growth ratee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
growth prophasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“especially in growth prophase,the plants cultured in organic substrate had a higher growth rate and a richer aroma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“edible perfume plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic substrate gave richer aroma during early growth.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
organic substratee0
Outcome
aromae0
Direction
richere0
Qualifier
growth prophasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“especially in growth prophase,the plants cultured in organic substrate had a higher growth rate and a richer aroma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“edible perfume plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑

growing medium · yield · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

growing medium · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

growing medium · quality: phytochemicals · Viridiplantae (plants)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.