Abstract
The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested.The results showed that the adjusted control effect was 89.5% and 79.7%,respectively 3 d after treatment;93.8% and 97.3%,respectively 7 d after treatment.The adjusted control effect was 88.9% and 92.4%,respectively 20 d after application,which was not significantly different from chlorantraniliprole,but significantly different from Fipronil(Regent).The leaf protection effect is 86.3% and 78.5%,respectively,7 d and 20 d after application.It was significantly different from chlorantraniliprole,and very significantly different from Fipronil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide 20% WDG gave an adjusted control effect of 89.5% on rice stem borer 3 days after treatment.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- flubendiamide 20% WDGe0
- Interactor
- Chilo suppressalis
.jpg?width=60)
Chilo suppressalist0pest - Outcome
- adjusted control effecte1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 89.5%e1
- Qualifier
- 3 d after treatmente1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Flubendiamide 20% WDG against Chilo suppressalis(Walker) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee”
e0“The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested”
e1“The results showed that the adjusted control effect was 89.5% and 79.7%,respectively 3 d after treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide 20% WDG gave an adjusted control effect of 79.7% on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis 3 days after treatment.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 20% WDGe0
- Interactor
- Cnaphalocrocis medinalis
Cnaphalocrocis medinalist0pest - Outcome
- adjusted control effecte1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 79.7%e1
- Qualifier
- 3 d after treatmente1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Flubendiamide 20% WDG against Chilo suppressalis(Walker) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee”
e0“The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested”
e1“The results showed that the adjusted control effect was 89.5% and 79.7%,respectively 3 d after treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide 20% WDG gave an adjusted control effect of 93.8% on rice stem borer 7 days after treatment.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 20% WDGe0
- Interactor
- Chilo suppressalisChilo suppressalist0pest
- Outcome
- adjusted control effecte1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 93.8%e2
- Qualifier
- 7 d after treatmente2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Flubendiamide 20% WDG against Chilo suppressalis(Walker) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee”
e0“The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested”
e1“The results showed that the adjusted control effect was 89.5% and 79.7%,respectively 3 d after treatment”
e2“93.8% and 97.3%,respectively 7 d after treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide 20% WDG gave an adjusted control effect of 97.3% on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis 7 days after treatment.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 20% WDGe0
- Interactor
- Cnaphalocrocis medinalisCnaphalocrocis medinalist0pest
- Outcome
- adjusted control effecte1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 97.3%e2
- Qualifier
- 7 d after treatmente2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Flubendiamide 20% WDG against Chilo suppressalis(Walker) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee”
e0“The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested”
e1“The results showed that the adjusted control effect was 89.5% and 79.7%,respectively 3 d after treatment”
e2“93.8% and 97.3%,respectively 7 d after treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide 20% WDG gave an adjusted control effect of 88.9% on rice stem borer 20 days after application.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 20% WDGe0
- Interactor
- Chilo suppressalisChilo suppressalist0pest
- Outcome
- adjusted control effecte3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Value
- 88.9%e3
- Qualifier
- 20 d after applicatione3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Flubendiamide 20% WDG against Chilo suppressalis(Walker) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee”
e0“The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested”
e1“The results showed that the adjusted control effect was 89.5% and 79.7%,respectively 3 d after treatment”
e3“The adjusted control effect was 88.9% and 92.4%,respectively 20 d after application,which was not significantly different from chlorantraniliprole,but significantly different from Fipronil(Regent)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide 20% WDG gave an adjusted control effect of 92.4% on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis 20 days after application.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 20% WDGe0
- Interactor
- Cnaphalocrocis medinalisCnaphalocrocis medinalist0pest
- Outcome
- adjusted control effecte3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Value
- 92.4%e3
- Qualifier
- 20 d after applicatione3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Flubendiamide 20% WDG against Chilo suppressalis(Walker) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee”
e0“The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested”
e1“The results showed that the adjusted control effect was 89.5% and 79.7%,respectively 3 d after treatment”
e3“The adjusted control effect was 88.9% and 92.4%,respectively 20 d after application,which was not significantly different from chlorantraniliprole,but significantly different from Fipronil(Regent)”
Claim · model-written summary
The adjusted control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG at 20 days was not significantly different from chlorantraniliprole.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 20% WDGe0
- Outcome
- adjusted control effecte3
- Direction
- not significantly differente3
- Comparator
- chlorantraniliprolee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Flubendiamide 20% WDG against Chilo suppressalis(Walker) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee”
e0“The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested”
e3“The adjusted control effect was 88.9% and 92.4%,respectively 20 d after application,which was not significantly different from chlorantraniliprole,but significantly different from Fipronil(Regent)”
Claim · model-written summary
The adjusted control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG at 20 days was significantly different from Fipronil.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 20% WDGe0
- Outcome
- adjusted control effecte3
- Direction
- significantly differente3
- Comparator
- Fipronil(Regent)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Flubendiamide 20% WDG against Chilo suppressalis(Walker) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee”
e0“The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested”
e3“The adjusted control effect was 88.9% and 92.4%,respectively 20 d after application,which was not significantly different from chlorantraniliprole,but significantly different from Fipronil(Regent)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide 20% WDG gave a leaf protection effect of 86.3% 7 days after application.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 20% WDGe0
- Outcome
- leaf protection effecte4
- Direction
- higherinferrede4
- Value
- 86.3%e4
- Qualifier
- 7 de4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Flubendiamide 20% WDG against Chilo suppressalis(Walker) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee”
e0“The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested”
e4“The leaf protection effect is 86.3% and 78.5%,respectively,7 d and 20 d after application”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide 20% WDG gave a leaf protection effect of 78.5% 20 days after application.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 20% WDGe0
- Outcome
- leaf protection effecte4
- Direction
- higherinferrede4
- Value
- 78.5%e4
- Qualifier
- 20 de4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Flubendiamide 20% WDG against Chilo suppressalis(Walker) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee”
e0“The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested”
e4“The leaf protection effect is 86.3% and 78.5%,respectively,7 d and 20 d after application”
Claim · model-written summary
The leaf protection effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG was significantly different from chlorantraniliprole.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 20% WDGe0
- Outcome
- leaf protection effecte4
- Direction
- significantly differente5
- Comparator
- chlorantraniliprolee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Flubendiamide 20% WDG against Chilo suppressalis(Walker) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee”
e0“The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested”
e4“The leaf protection effect is 86.3% and 78.5%,respectively,7 d and 20 d after application”
e5“It was significantly different from chlorantraniliprole, and very significantly different from Fipronil”
Claim · model-written summary
The leaf protection effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG was very significantly different from Fipronil.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- flubendiamide 20% WDGe0
- Outcome
- leaf protection effecte4
- Direction
- very significantly differente5
- Comparator
- Fipronile5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Flubendiamide 20% WDG against Chilo suppressalis(Walker) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee”
e0“The control effect of flubendiamide 20% WDG on rice stem borer and on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee was tested”
e4“The leaf protection effect is 86.3% and 78.5%,respectively,7 d and 20 d after application”
e5“It was significantly different from chlorantraniliprole, and very significantly different from Fipronil”
The same questions in other papers
flubendiamide · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
flubendiamide · Cnaphalocrocis medinalis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.