Paper · 2015 · Gansu Nongye Daxue xuebao

Effect of water and fertilizer coupling on cell defense enzymes and yield in broccoli

LI Lu-sha

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The study aimed to discuss the physiological responses of broccoli to water and fertilizer coupling to find the optimum water and fertilizer treatments.A field experiment was carried out to study the effects of different water and fertilizer coupling on cell defense enzyme and yield.In harvesting period,the root volume of broccoli was the best in the middle water and fertilizer combination and the low water and fertilizer.Low fertilizer was better than high fertilizer and middle fertilizer combination SDO,POD and MDA in broccoli increased with the advancement of reproductive period.Fertilizer had greater influence on content of SOD,at low level treatment,SOD content was lower.In contract,POD in low fertilizer level was higher than high and middle level.At rosette stage,MDA content of F2W2 was the lowest,and less than F3W2,F3W3,F4W1 by 7%,6.8%and 4.8%.F2W2 and F3W2treatments had is the optimum effect,reached1 936.25kg/667m2 and 1929.25kg/667m2,which were higher than F4W3 by 49.8% and 50.3%.Middle water and fertilizer resulted in the maximum yield and cell defense enzyme activity.It is suggested that middle water and fertilizer treatments satisfy the plant growing and bring to bear water and fertilizer cou-pling effectiveness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli root volume was best under middle and low water-fertilizer combinations.

Treatment
middle water and fertilizer combination and the low water and fertilizere0
Outcome
root volumee0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root volume of broccoli was the best in the middle water and fertilizer combination and the low water and fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–425 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli SOD, POD and MDA increased as the reproductive period advanced.

Organ / stage
reproductive periode0
Outcome
SDO,POD and MDAe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDO,POD and MDA in broccoli increased with the advancement of reproductive period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli SOD content was lower at the low fertilizer level.

Treatment
low level treatmente0
Outcome
SOD contente0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer had greater influence on content of SOD,at low level treatment,SOD content was lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli POD was higher under low fertilizer than high and middle levels.

Treatment
low fertilizer levele0
Outcome
PODe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
high and middle levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POD in low fertilizer level was higher than high and middle level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At rosette stage, broccoli MDA under F2W2 was 7% lower than F3W2.

Organ / stage
rosette stagee0
Treatment
F2W2e0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
less thane0
Value
7%e0
Comparator
F3W2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At rosette stage,MDA content of F2W2 was the lowest,and less than F3W2,F3W3,F4W1 by 7%,6.8%and 4.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At rosette stage, broccoli MDA under F2W2 was 6.8% lower than F3W3.

Organ / stage
rosette stagee0
Treatment
F2W2e0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
less thane0
Value
6.8%e0
Comparator
F3W3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At rosette stage,MDA content of F2W2 was the lowest,and less than F3W2,F3W3,F4W1 by 7%,6.8%and 4.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At rosette stage, broccoli MDA under F2W2 was 4.8% lower than F4W1.

Organ / stage
rosette stagee0
Treatment
F2W2e0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
less thane0
Value
4.8%e0
Comparator
F4W1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At rosette stage,MDA content of F2W2 was the lowest,and less than F3W2,F3W3,F4W1 by 7%,6.8%and 4.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F2W2 broccoli yield reached 1 936.25kg/667m2, reported as 49.8% higher than F4W3.

Treatment
F2W2e0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere0
Value
1 936.25kg/667m2e0
Qualifier
49.8%e0
Comparator
F4W3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F2W2 and F3W2treatments had is the optimum effect,reached1 936.25kg/667m2 and 1929.25kg/667m2,which were higher than F4W3 by 49.8% and 50.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“Middle water and fertilizer resulted in the maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F3W2 broccoli yield reached 1929.25kg/667m2, reported as 50.3% higher than F4W3.

Treatment
F3W2e0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere0
Value
1929.25kg/667m2e0
Qualifier
50.3%e0
Comparator
F4W3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F2W2 and F3W2treatments had is the optimum effect,reached1 936.25kg/667m2 and 1929.25kg/667m2,which were higher than F4W3 by 49.8% and 50.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“Middle water and fertilizer resulted in the maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Middle water and fertilizer produced maximum broccoli cell defense enzyme activity.

Treatment
Middle water and fertilizere0
Outcome
cell defense enzyme activitye0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Middle water and fertilizer resulted in the maximum yield and cell defense enzyme activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest middle water and fertilizer treatments for broccoli growth and water-fertilizer coupling effectiveness.

Outcome
middle water and fertilizer treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is suggested that middle water and fertilizer treatments satisfy the plant growing and bring to bear water and fertilizer cou-pling effectiveness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: biology · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.