Paper · 2012 · Yunnan Nongye Daxue xuebao

Analysis and Evaluation of Yield Advantages in Wheat and Faba Bean Intercropping System in Yunnan Province

Jingxiu Xiao

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wheat and faba bean intercropping is one of the main intercropping patterns in Yunnan Province.It can improve yields,decrease occurrence of pests and diseases,and improve utilization efficiency of nutrient,water and light energy.Based on more than 40 groups of field experiment results by our project team from 2001 to 2010,the yield advantages of wheat and faba bean intercropping were analyzed in 4 experimental sites including Luliang,Yuxi,Shilin and Kunming.The results showed that the yields of wheat and faba bean were increased by 13.24% and 14.80% respectively in intercropping.The mean value of land equivalent ratio(LER) was 1.14,indicating yields advantage in intercropping system.Nevertheless,intercropping yield advantage had a apparent difference between 4 experimental sites.The LER were 1.14,1.21,and 1.14 in Luliang,Yuxi,and Kunming respectively.The yields competitiveness(Awf) was primarily from faba bean in Yuxi,whereas from wheat in other sites.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased wheat yield by 13.24%.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
yields of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the yields of wheat and faba bean were increased by 13.24% and 14.80% respectively in intercropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased faba bean yield by 14.80%.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
faba beane0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the yields of wheat and faba bean were increased by 13.24% and 14.80% respectively in intercropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–586 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean land equivalent ratio was 1.14, indicating an intercropping yield advantage.

Taxon
Wheat and Faba BeanVicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
land equivalent ratioe0
Direction
advantagee0
Value
1.14e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean value of land equivalent ratio(LER) was 1.14,indicating yields advantage in intercropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping yield advantage differed among four sites.

Taxon
Wheat and Faba BeanVicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
intercropping yield advantagee0
Qualifier
difference between 4 experimental sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nevertheless,intercropping yield advantage had a apparent difference between 4 experimental sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land equivalent ratio was 1.14 in Luliang.

Taxon
Wheat and Faba BeanVicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
LERe0
Value
1.14e0
Setting
Luliange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LER were 1.14,1.21,and 1.14 in Luliang,Yuxi,and Kunming respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land equivalent ratio was 1.21 in Yuxi.

Taxon
Wheat and Faba BeanVicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
LERe0
Value
1.21e0
Setting
Yuxie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LER were 1.14,1.21,and 1.14 in Luliang,Yuxi,and Kunming respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land equivalent ratio was 1.14 in Kunming.

Taxon
Wheat and Faba BeanVicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
LERe0
Value
1.14e0
Setting
Kunminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LER were 1.14,1.21,and 1.14 in Luliang,Yuxi,and Kunming respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean contributed most to yield competitiveness in Yuxi.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Outcome
yields competitiveness(Awf)e0
Direction
primarilye0
Setting
Yuxie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields competitiveness(Awf) was primarily from faba bean in Yuxi,whereas from wheat in other sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–966 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat contributed most to yield competitiveness at the other sites.

Outcome
yields competitiveness(Awf)e0
Setting
other sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields competitiveness(Awf) was primarily from faba bean in Yuxi,whereas from wheat in other sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–966 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

189 papers: 131 positive, 58 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

intercropping · organism · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.