Paper · 2009 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effects of Spraying Microbial Preparation on Protein Degradation and Neutral Aroma Component in Upper Leaves of Flue-cured Tobacco

Zhaopeng Song

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The study aimed to discuss the change law of protein degradation and neutral aroma component in upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco after spraying microbial preparation.[Method] The self-made curing barn with automat-control of temperature and humidity was used to research the effect of spraying microbial preparation with 3 treatments as 40 U/g neutral protease(T1),40 U/g αamylase + glucoamylase+ neutral protease(T2) and 30 U/g special made fermentation liquid(T3) on solubility protein degradation and neutral aroma component in upper leaves in the flue-cured tobacco during baking prophase.[Result] Spraying some dosages of special in 12 h before baking made fermented liquid,neutral protease and the mixture of neutral protease,α-amylase and glucoamylase on the upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco could decrease the solubility protein content in the upper leaves,especially the T2 and T3 had a better results.All the treatments could increase the content of neutral aroma component to some degree,but there was a great difference among the treatments.[Conclusion] T1 and T3 were better on the total amount of neutral aroma component,but T3 was the best on comprehensive effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neutral protease treatment decreased soluble protein in upper tobacco leaves.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Organ / stage
upper leavese1
Treatment
neutral proteasee1
Outcome
solubility protein contente1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“40 U/g neutral protease(T1),40 U/g αamylase + glucoamylase+ neutral protease(T2) and 30 U/g special made fermentation liquid(T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–479 · show in text ↑
e1

“fermented liquid,neutral protease and the mixture of neutral protease,α-amylase and glucoamylase on the upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco could decrease the solubility protein content in the upper leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The enzyme mixture decreased soluble protein in upper tobacco leaves, with a comparatively better result.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Organ / stage
upper leavese1
Treatment
mixture of neutral protease,α-amylase and glucoamylasee1
Outcome
solubility protein contente1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“40 U/g αamylase + glucoamylase+ neutral protease(T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–431 · show in text ↑
e1

“the mixture of neutral protease,α-amylase and glucoamylase on the upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco could decrease the solubility protein content in the upper leaves,especially the T2 and T3 had a better results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation liquid decreased soluble protein in upper tobacco leaves, with a comparatively better result.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Organ / stage
upper leavese1
Treatment
fermented liquide1
Outcome
solubility protein contente1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“30 U/g special made fermentation liquid(T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–479 · show in text ↑
e1

“fermented liquid,neutral protease and the mixture of neutral protease,α-amylase and glucoamylase on the upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco could decrease the solubility protein content in the upper leaves,especially the T2 and T3 had a better results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–927 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three preparations increased neutral aroma component content to varying degrees.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Outcome
content of neutral aroma componente0
Direction
increasee0

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the treatments could increase the content of neutral aroma component to some degree,but there was a great difference among the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1069 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 and T3 performed better for the total amount of neutral aroma components.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Outcome
total amount of neutral aroma componente0
Direction
bettere0

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“T1 and T3 were better on the total amount of neutral aroma component”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 had the best comprehensive effect.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Outcome
best on comprehensive effecte0
Direction
beste0

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“T3 was the best on comprehensive effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1195 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: protein · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.