Paper · 2014 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Effect of Phosphorus on Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Soil Nitrate Content of the Wheat/Maize/Soybean Relay-intercropping System

Chen Yuan-xu

15
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Based on the located phosphorus experiment on the wheat/maize/soybean relay-intercropping system for two consecutive years(2011-2012),the third year(2013)which focused on the effect of different rates of phosphorus on N utilization efficiency of the system and soil nitrate content change was carried out.The results showed that:(1)Aboveground dry matter accumulation and grain yield of wheat,maize and soybean reduced after the firstly increased with increasing phosphorus application.Compared with P1treatment,the total annual grain yield of the system in P2~P5treatments increased by 25.5%,31.9%,43.8%,18.3%,respectively.(2)Phosphorus application could significantly promote aboveground nitrogen accumulation,and enhance N utilization efficiency of crops,but less affect nitrogen physiological use efficiency of three crops.Compared with P1treatment,grain N accumulation of the system in P2~P5treatments increased by 33.5%,43.4%,56.1%,17.2%,respectively.While PFP-N of the system in P1treatment was reduced by 20.0%,26.2%,32.5%,17.9%,respectively comparing with P2~P5treatments.(3)There was no remarked difference for soil nitrate content among the treatments,and soil nitrate content of three crops at harvest stage were at a relatively low level because of the increasing of aboveground N accumulation.The difference value between the N inputs and the N outputs in P1~P5treatments were 76.1,-18.2,-50.0,-77.7,15.7kg/hm2,i.e.except for P1and P5treatments the N outputs was larger than the N inputs for P2~P4treatments.It showed that moderate phosphorus application could improve crops N uptake and therefore increase N use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter accumulation and grain yield first rose and then fell with phosphorus rate.

Taxon
wheat,maize and soybeane0
Treatment
increasing phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
Aboveground dry matter accumulation and grain yielde0
Direction
reduced after the firstly increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Aboveground dry matter accumulation and grain yield of wheat,maize and soybean reduced after the firstly increased with increasing phosphorus application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual grain yield increased 25.5% with P2 versus P1.

Treatment
P2e0
Outcome
total annual grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.5%e0
Comparator
P1treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with P1treatment,the total annual grain yield of the system in P2~P5treatments increased by 25.5%,31.9%,43.8%,18.3%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual grain yield increased 31.9% with P3 versus P1.

Treatment
P2~P5treatmentse0
Outcome
total annual grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31.9%e0
Comparator
P1treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with P1treatment,the total annual grain yield of the system in P2~P5treatments increased by 25.5%,31.9%,43.8%,18.3%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual grain yield increased 43.8% with P4 versus P1.

Treatment
P2~P5treatmentse0
Outcome
total annual grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43.8%e0
Comparator
P1treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with P1treatment,the total annual grain yield of the system in P2~P5treatments increased by 25.5%,31.9%,43.8%,18.3%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual grain yield increased 18.3% with P5 versus P1.

Treatment
P5e0
Outcome
total annual grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.3%e0
Comparator
P1treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with P1treatment,the total annual grain yield of the system in P2~P5treatments increased by 25.5%,31.9%,43.8%,18.3%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus significantly increased aboveground nitrogen accumulation.

Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
aboveground nitrogen accumulatione0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application could significantly promote aboveground nitrogen accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus enhanced crop nitrogen utilization efficiency.

Taxon
cropse0
Outcome
N utilization efficiencye0
Direction
enhancee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“enhance N utilization efficiency of crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus had little effect on nitrogen physiological use efficiency.

Taxon
three cropse0
Outcome
nitrogen physiological use efficiencye0
Direction
less affecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but less affect nitrogen physiological use efficiency of three crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain nitrogen accumulation increased under P2 through P5 versus P1 by 33.5%, 43.4%, 56.1%, and 17.2%, respectively.

Treatment
P2~P5treatmentse0
Outcome
grain N accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
P1treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with P1treatment,grain N accumulation of the system in P2~P5treatments increased by 33.5%,43.4%,56.1%,17.2%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–957 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PFP-N under P1 was lower than P2 through P5 by 20.0%, 26.2%, 32.5%, and 17.9%, respectively.

Outcome
PFP-Ne0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“PFP-N of the system in P1treatment was reduced by 20.0%,26.2%,32.5%,17.9%,respectively comparing with P2~P5treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1081 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrate did not differ markedly among treatments.

Outcome
soil nitrate contente0
Direction
no remarked differencee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“There was no remarked difference for soil nitrate content among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrate was relatively low at harvest for all three crops.

Taxon
three cropse0
Outcome
soil nitrate contente0
Direction
relatively lowe0

Verbatim

e0

“soil nitrate content of three crops at harvest stage were at a relatively low level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1250 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen input minus output was 76.1, -18.2, -50.0, -77.7, and 15.7 kg/hm2 for P1 through P5, respectively.

Outcome
difference value between the N inputs and the N outputse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The difference value between the N inputs and the N outputs in P1~P5treatments were 76.1,-18.2,-50.0,-77.7,15.7kg/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1424 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under P2 through P4, nitrogen output exceeded input.

Outcome
N outputse0
Direction
larger thane0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the N outputs was larger than the N inputs for P2~P4treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1521 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate phosphorus application was concluded to improve nitrogen uptake and use efficiency.

Taxon
cropse0
Outcome
moderate phosphorus applicatione0

Verbatim

e0

“moderate phosphorus application could improve crops N uptake and therefore increase N use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1638 · show in text ↑