Paper · 2005 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Effect of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Nitrogen Utilization of Paddy Field System and Environment Impact Under Two Soils

Tao Feng

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The paper studied the nitrogen dynamic in rice-soil-leakage water system under different N application levels based on split supply in paddy rice field. The result showed that N uptake of rice increased quickly with the N application up to (225) kg/hm~2, and N uptake amount changed little when the applied nitrogen were more than 225 kg/hm~2. Nitrogen accumulation dynamic in soil showed that the long-term fertility for rice crop growth could not be sustained under 75 kg/hm~2 N application, but when N supply exceeded 225 kg/hm~2, a lot of surplus nitrogen was accumulated in soil. There was significant correlation between nitrogen applied levels with average total N concentration of the leakage water andcoefficient is 0.943. The period of booting stage to grain-filling stage is an important time for rice nitrogen uptake. N accumulation in soil increased quickly and the peak of N content in leakage water appeared after basal nitrogen applied, which implied that basal nitrogen fertilizer being more than 50% of the total applied amount may be the main reason leading to soil nitrogen accumulation and water pollution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice nitrogen uptake increased rapidly as N application rose to 225 kg/hm~2.

Treatment
N application up to (225) kg/hm~2e0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increased quicklye0
Value
(225) kg/hm~2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake of rice increased quickly with the N application up to (225) kg/hm~2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice nitrogen uptake changed little above 225 kg/hm~2 of applied N.

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
applied nitrogen were more than 225 kg/hm~2e0
Outcome
N uptake amounte0
Direction
changed littlee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake amount changed little when the applied nitrogen were more than 225 kg/hm~2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy Field System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 75 kg/hm~2 N application did not sustain long-term soil fertility for rice growth.

Treatment
75 kg/hm~2 N applicatione0
Outcome
long-term fertility for rice crop growthe0
Direction
could not be sustainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the long-term fertility for rice crop growth could not be sustained under 75 kg/hm~2 N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N supply above 225 kg/hm~2 led to substantial surplus nitrogen accumulation in soil.

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
N supply exceeded 225 kg/hm~2e0
Outcome
surplus nitrogen was accumulated in soile0
Direction
accumulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when N supply exceeded 225 kg/hm~2, a lot of surplus nitrogen was accumulated in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy Field System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N application level correlated significantly with average total N concentration in leakage water, with coefficient 0.943.

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
nitrogen applied levelse0
Outcome
average total N concentration of the leakage watere0
Value
0.943e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“significant correlation between nitrogen applied levels with average total N concentration of the leakage water andcoefficient is 0.943”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy Field System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Booting through grain filling was identified as an important period of rice N uptake.

Organ / stage
booting stage to grain-filling stagee0
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The period of booting stage to grain-filling stage is an important time for rice nitrogen uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N accumulation increased rapidly after basal N application.

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
basal nitrogen appliede0
Outcome
N accumulation in soile0
Direction
increased quicklye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“N accumulation in soil increased quickly and the peak of N content in leakage water appeared after basal nitrogen applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy Field System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leakage-water N content peaked after basal N application.

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
basal nitrogen appliede0
Outcome
N content in leakage watere0
Direction
peake0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the peak of N content in leakage water appeared after basal nitrogen applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy Field System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that basal N above half of total application may cause soil N accumulation and water pollution.

Taxon
Paddyt0
Treatment
basal nitrogen fertilizer being more than 50% of the total applied amounte0
Outcome
soil nitrogen accumulation and water pollutione0
Qualifier
may be the main reasone0

Verbatim

e0

“basal nitrogen fertilizer being more than 50% of the total applied amount may be the main reason leading to soil nitrogen accumulation and water pollution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Paddy Field System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–93 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 402 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.