Abstract
Aim to evaluate effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang,a field experiment were carried out that effects of different durations of disclosing plastic film with 5 treatments on tobacco leaf production,average price,the proportion of quality tobacco,the total sugar content,nicotine content, K_2O content,aroma,fragrant qualities,mixed gas and irritating were studied by the way of using gray relational analysis,which included No Film,20 days after transplanting removing film,35 days after transplanting removing film,50 days after transplanting removing film,whole field duration film. The results showed that 35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality.Its yield,average price,high grades proportion,total sugar,nicotine,K_2O,volume of aroma, quality of aroma,offensive odor,irritation respectively fellow as 167.25 kg/666.7m~2,12.13 Yuan/kg,56.4%,38.36%,2.52%,2.13%,6,6,5.5,5.5.The analysis was consistent with the actual production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting was the best process for an optimal tobacco leaf.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- optimal tobacco leafe1
- Direction
- beste1
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting gave more coordination in chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- chemical qualitye1
- Direction
- more coordinatione1
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting gave a high score in smoking assessment of flue-cured tobacco.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- smoking assessmente1
- Direction
- high scoree1
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting gave a yield of 167.25 kg/666.7m~2 for flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Value
- 167.25 kg/666.7m~2e2
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
e2“Its yield,average price,high grades proportion,total sugar,nicotine,K_2O,volume of aroma, quality of aroma,offensive odor,irritation respectively fellow as 167.25 kg/666.7m~2,12.13 Yuan/kg,56.4%,38.36%,2.52%,2.13%,6,6,5.5,5.5”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting gave a average price of 12.13 Yuan/kg for flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- average pricee2
- Value
- 12.13 Yuan/kge2
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
e2“Its yield,average price,high grades proportion,total sugar,nicotine,K_2O,volume of aroma, quality of aroma,offensive odor,irritation respectively fellow as 167.25 kg/666.7m~2,12.13 Yuan/kg,56.4%,38.36%,2.52%,2.13%,6,6,5.5,5.5”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting gave a high grades proportion of 56.4% for flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- high grades proportione2
- Value
- 56.4%e2
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
e2“Its yield,average price,high grades proportion,total sugar,nicotine,K_2O,volume of aroma, quality of aroma,offensive odor,irritation respectively fellow as 167.25 kg/666.7m~2,12.13 Yuan/kg,56.4%,38.36%,2.52%,2.13%,6,6,5.5,5.5”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting gave a total sugar content of 38.36% for flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- total sugare2
- Value
- 38.36%e2
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
e2“Its yield,average price,high grades proportion,total sugar,nicotine,K_2O,volume of aroma, quality of aroma,offensive odor,irritation respectively fellow as 167.25 kg/666.7m~2,12.13 Yuan/kg,56.4%,38.36%,2.52%,2.13%,6,6,5.5,5.5”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting gave a nicotine content of 2.52% for flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- nicotinee2
- Value
- 2.52%e2
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
e2“Its yield,average price,high grades proportion,total sugar,nicotine,K_2O,volume of aroma, quality of aroma,offensive odor,irritation respectively fellow as 167.25 kg/666.7m~2,12.13 Yuan/kg,56.4%,38.36%,2.52%,2.13%,6,6,5.5,5.5”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting gave a K_2O content of 2.13% for flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- K_2Oe2
- Value
- 2.13%e2
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
e2“Its yield,average price,high grades proportion,total sugar,nicotine,K_2O,volume of aroma, quality of aroma,offensive odor,irritation respectively fellow as 167.25 kg/666.7m~2,12.13 Yuan/kg,56.4%,38.36%,2.52%,2.13%,6,6,5.5,5.5”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting gave a volume of aroma score of 6 for flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- volume of aromae2
- Value
- 6e2
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
e2“Its yield,average price,high grades proportion,total sugar,nicotine,K_2O,volume of aroma, quality of aroma,offensive odor,irritation respectively fellow as 167.25 kg/666.7m~2,12.13 Yuan/kg,56.4%,38.36%,2.52%,2.13%,6,6,5.5,5.5”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting gave a quality of aroma score of 6 for flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- quality of aromae2
- Value
- 6e2
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
e2“Its yield,average price,high grades proportion,total sugar,nicotine,K_2O,volume of aroma, quality of aroma,offensive odor,irritation respectively fellow as 167.25 kg/666.7m~2,12.13 Yuan/kg,56.4%,38.36%,2.52%,2.13%,6,6,5.5,5.5”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting gave a offensive odor score of 5.5 for flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- offensive odore2
- Value
- 5.5e2
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
e2“Its yield,average price,high grades proportion,total sugar,nicotine,K_2O,volume of aroma, quality of aroma,offensive odor,irritation respectively fellow as 167.25 kg/666.7m~2,12.13 Yuan/kg,56.4%,38.36%,2.52%,2.13%,6,6,5.5,5.5”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing film 35 days after transplanting gave a irritation score of 5.5 for flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang.
- Taxon
- flue-cured tobaccoe0
- Treatment
- 35 days after transplanting removing filme1
- Outcome
- irritatione2
- Value
- 5.5e2
- Setting
- Lijiange0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e1“35 days after transplanting removing film was the best process which had a optimal tobacco leaf;more coordination in chemical quality;high score in smoking assessment and good quality”
e2“Its yield,average price,high grades proportion,total sugar,nicotine,K_2O,volume of aroma, quality of aroma,offensive odor,irritation respectively fellow as 167.25 kg/666.7m~2,12.13 Yuan/kg,56.4%,38.36%,2.52%,2.13%,6,6,5.5,5.5”
Claim · model-written summary
The grey relational analysis was consistent with actual tobacco production.
Verbatim
e0“effect of plastic film on the flue-cured tobacco in Lijiang”
e3“The analysis was consistent with the actual production”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · organism · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →transplanting · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.