Paper · 2010 · Shanxi nongye kexue

Effect to Yield and Quality of Rape Cultivated in Reclaimed Soil by Cooperation of Chicken Manure and Bacterial Fertilizer

Xie Yinghe

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The reclaimed soil and rape as experimental material,this experiment adopts the randomized block design,adopts fertilizer as basis and uses chicken manure and bacterial fertilizer together as formulation fertilizer.The results showed that: single use of chicken manure or bacterial fertilizer could improve the rapeseed yield,quality and nutrients of the rape.But on the whole,when the chicken manure and bacterial fertilizer was used in a certain proportion,the effect would more pronounced.In treatment 11 the rapeseed yield,sugar content,total nitrogen,total phosphorus nutrients reached the highest.The rapeseed yield increased 183%;sugar content 76.3%,and the total nitrogen and total phosphorus increased 66.1% and 77% compared with CK treatment;the nitrate content was the lowest,reduced by 64% than in CK;other indicators were also significantly higher than those in CK treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure alone improved rapeseed yield, quality and nutrients.

Treatment
chicken manuree0
Outcome
rapeseed yield,quality and nutrientse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“single use of chicken manure or bacterial fertilizer could improve the rapeseed yield,quality and nutrients of the rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial fertilizer alone improved rapeseed yield, quality and nutrients.

Treatment
bacterial fertilizere0
Outcome
rapeseed yield,quality and nutrientse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“single use of chicken manure or bacterial fertilizer could improve the rapeseed yield,quality and nutrients of the rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure and bacterial fertilizer in a certain proportion had a more pronounced effect overall.

Treatment
chicken manure and bacterial fertilizere0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the chicken manure and bacterial fertilizer was used in a certain proportion,the effect would more pronounced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–491 · show in text ↑
e1

“rape as experimental material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 11 produced the highest rapeseed yield, 183% above CK.

Treatment
treatment 11e0
Outcome
rapeseed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
183%e0
Comparator
CK treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In treatment 11 the rapeseed yield,sugar content,total nitrogen,total phosphorus nutrients reached the highest.The rapeseed yield increased 183%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with CK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–751 · show in text ↑
e2

“rape as experimental material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 11 had highest sugar content, 76.3% above CK.

Treatment
treatment 11e0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
76.3%e0
Comparator
CK treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In treatment 11 the rapeseed yield,sugar content,total nitrogen,total phosphorus nutrients reached the highest.The rapeseed yield increased 183%;sugar content 76.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with CK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–751 · show in text ↑
e2

“rape as experimental material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 11 had highest total nitrogen, 66.1% above CK.

Treatment
treatment 11e0
Outcome
total nitrogene0
Direction
increasede1
Value
66.1%e1
Comparator
CK treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In treatment 11 the rapeseed yield,sugar content,total nitrogen,total phosphorus nutrients reached the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–602 · show in text ↑
e1

“the total nitrogen and total phosphorus increased 66.1% and 77% compared with CK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–751 · show in text ↑
e2

“rape as experimental material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 11 had highest total phosphorus, 77% above CK.

Treatment
treatment 11e0
Outcome
total phosphoruse0
Direction
increasede1
Value
77%e1
Comparator
CK treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In treatment 11 the rapeseed yield,sugar content,total nitrogen,total phosphorus nutrients reached the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–602 · show in text ↑
e1

“the total nitrogen and total phosphorus increased 66.1% and 77% compared with CK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–751 · show in text ↑
e2

“rape as experimental material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 11 had the lowest nitrate content, 64% below CK.

Treatment
treatment 11e1
Outcome
nitrate contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
64%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nitrate content was the lowest,reduced by 64% than in CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“In treatment 11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–507 · show in text ↑
e2

“rape as experimental material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Other indicators in treatment 11 were significantly higher than CK.

Treatment
treatment 11e1
Outcome
other indicatorse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CK treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“other indicators were also significantly higher than those in CK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“In treatment 11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–507 · show in text ↑
e2

“rape as experimental material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–52 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.