Abstract
Based on a long-term fertilization experiment of peanut continuous cropping obstacles, which had been established in Red Soil Ecological Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences from 1996, it was explored the development regularity of Peanut Bacterial Wilt with 12-year contiuous fertilization. The resluts showed that soil-borne disease occurred in all treatments. The peanut soil-borne diseases incidence of chemical fertilizer treatment (F) was 68% in maturing stage, while organic manure + effective microorganisms treatment (BM) was about 8%. Organic manure or organic manure + effective microorganisms could control the occurence of peanut soil-borne diseases. Peanut bacterial wilt was the main soil-borne disease of continuous cropping peanuts and its pathogens was identified as Ralstonia solanacearum.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical fertilizer treatment had higher peanut soil-borne disease incidence (68%) at maturity than organic manure plus effective microorganisms (about 8%).
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Organ / stage
- maturing stagee1
- Treatment
- chemical fertilizer treatment (F)e1
- Outcome
- peanut soil-borne diseases incidencee1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 68%e1
- Qualifier
- about 8%e1
- Comparator
- organic manure + effective microorganisms treatment (BM)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The peanut soil-borne diseases incidence of chemical fertilizer treatment (F) was 68% in maturing stage, while organic manure + effective microorganisms treatment (BM) was about 8%”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic manure, alone or with effective microorganisms, decreased the occurrence of peanut soil-borne diseases.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae2
- Treatment
- Organic manure or organic manure + effective microorganismse2
- Outcome
- occurence of peanut soil-borne diseasese2
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Organic manure or organic manure + effective microorganisms could control the occurence of peanut soil-borne diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil-borne disease occurred in all peanut treatments.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- soil-borne disease occurrede3
- Qualifier
- in all treatmentse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“soil-borne disease occurred in all treatments”
t0“with Peanut Continous Croping on Red Soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut bacterial wilt was the main soil-borne disease of continuous cropping peanuts.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeae4
- Outcome
- main soil-borne diseasee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Peanut bacterial wilt was the main soil-borne disease of continuous cropping peanuts”
Claim · model-written summary
The peanut bacterial wilt pathogen was identified as Ralstonia solanacearum.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Interactor
- Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearume5pathogen - Outcome
- pathogense5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“its pathogens was identified as Ralstonia solanacearum”
t0“with Peanut Continous Croping on Red Soil”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →fertilization · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →fertilization · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →organic · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.