Paper · 2015 · HortTechnology

Optimizing Rowcover Deployment for Managing Bacterial Wilt and Using Compost for Organic Muskmelon Production

Elsa S. Sánchez; Ermita Hernández; Mark L. Gleason; et al.

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The goal of this study was to develop a systems-based strategy for organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila ) and nutrients while safeguarding yield and enhancing early harvest. Spunbond polypropylene rowcovers deployed for different timings during the growing season were evaluated for suppressing bacterial wilt and locally available compost was applied based on two different estimated rates of mineralization of organic nitrogen (N) to manage nutrients. In KY only, the use of rowcovers suppressed bacterial wilt incidence compared with not using rowcovers. However, the timing of rowcover removal did not impact wilt incidence. Under lower cucumber beetle [striped cucumber beetle ( Acalymma vittatum ) and spotted cucumber beetle ( Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi )] pressure in PA and IA, rowcovers did not consistently suppress season-long incidence of bacterial wilt. In four of five site-years in PA and IA, more marketable fruit were produced when rowcovers were removed 10 days after an action threshold (the date the first flower opened in PA; the date when ≥50% of plants in a subplot had developed perfect flowers in IA and KY) than when no 10-day delay was made or when no rowcovers were used. In addition, the no-rowcover treatment consistently had lower weight per marketable fruit. In KY, the same action threshold without the 10-day delay, followed by insecticide applications, resulted in the largest number of marketable fruit, but did not affect marketable fruit weight. In PA, marketable yield was higher using compost compared with the organic fertilizer in 1 year. No yield differences were observed by nutrient treatments in 2 years. In IA, marketable yield was lower with the low amount of compost compared with the organic fertilizer and yields with the high amount of compost were not different from the low amount or the organic fertilizer in the year it was evaluated. In KY, marketable yield was unaffected by the nutrient treatments in the year it was evaluated. Given these results, muskmelon growers in PA, IA, and KY who use compost may choose the lower compost rate to minimize production costs. Overall, these findings suggest that rowcover-based strategies for organic management of bacterial wilt need to be optimized on a regional basis, and that fertilization with compost is compatible with these strategies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rowcovers suppressed bacterial wilt incidence in muskmelon in Kentucky compared with no rowcovers.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
rowcoverse1
Interactor
Erwinia tracheiphilaErwinia tracheiphilae0pathogen
Outcome
bacterial wilt incidencee1
Direction
suppressede1
Comparator
not using rowcoverse1
Setting
KYe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia tracheiphila
Erwinia tracheiphila · InteractorEeshie · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“In KY only, the use of rowcovers suppressed bacterial wilt incidence compared with not using rowcovers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timing of rowcover removal did not affect bacterial wilt incidence in muskmelon.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
timing of rowcover removale2
Interactor
Erwinia tracheiphilaErwinia tracheiphilae0pathogen
Outcome
wilt incidencee2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia tracheiphila
Erwinia tracheiphila · InteractorEeshie · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, the timing of rowcover removal did not impact wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under lower cucumber beetle pressure, rowcovers did not consistently suppress season-long bacterial wilt incidence in muskmelon.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
rowcoverse3
Interactor
Erwinia tracheiphilaErwinia tracheiphilae0pathogen
Second interactor
Acalymma vittatumAcalymma vittatume4pest
Outcome
season-long incidence of bacterial wilte3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia tracheiphila
Erwinia tracheiphila · InteractorEeshie · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Acalymma vittatum
Acalymma vittatum · Second interactorScott Bauer, USDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e3

“rowcovers did not consistently suppress season-long incidence of bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–988 · show in text ↑
e4

“striped cucumber beetle ( Acalymma vittatum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing rowcovers 10 days after an action threshold produced more marketable muskmelon fruit than no delay or no rowcovers in PA and IA.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
rowcovers were removed 10 days after an action thresholde5
Outcome
marketable fruite5
Direction
moree5
Comparator
no 10-day delay was madee6
Setting
PA and IAe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e5

“In four of five site-years in PA and IA, more marketable fruit were produced when rowcovers were removed 10 days after an action threshold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1128 · show in text ↑
e6

“than when no 10-day delay was made or when no rowcovers were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The no-rowcover treatment had lower weight per marketable muskmelon fruit.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
no-rowcover treatmente7
Outcome
weight per marketable fruite7
Direction
lowere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e7

“the no-rowcover treatment consistently had lower weight per marketable fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same action threshold without the 10-day delay, followed by insecticide applications, gave the largest number of marketable fruit in KY.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
the same action threshold without the 10-day delay, followed by insecticide applicationse1
Outcome
number of marketable fruite1
Direction
largeste1
Setting
KYe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“In KY, the same action threshold without the 10-day delay, followed by insecticide applications, resulted in the largest number of marketable fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same KY action-threshold treatment did not affect marketable fruit weight.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
the same action threshold without the 10-day delay, followed by insecticide applicationse1
Outcome
marketable fruit weighte2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Setting
KYe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“In KY, the same action threshold without the 10-day delay, followed by insecticide applications, resulted in the largest number of marketable fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1561 · show in text ↑
e2

“but did not affect marketable fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost gave higher marketable yield than organic fertilizer in PA in one year.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
composte1
Outcome
marketable yielde1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
in 1 yeare1
Comparator
the organic fertilizere1
Setting
PAe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“In PA, marketable yield was higher using compost compared with the organic fertilizer in 1 year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient treatments caused no yield differences in muskmelon in two years.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
nutrient treatmentse1
Outcome
yield differencese1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
in 2 yearse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“No yield differences were observed by nutrient treatments in 2 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The low amount of compost gave lower marketable yield than organic fertilizer in IA.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
low amount of composte1
Outcome
marketable yielde1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
the organic fertilizere1
Setting
IAe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“In IA, marketable yield was lower with the low amount of compost compared with the organic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high amount of compost did not differ in yield from the low amount or organic fertilizer in the year evaluated in IA.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
high amount of composte1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
in the year it was evaluatede1
Comparator
the low amount or the organic fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“yields with the high amount of compost were not different from the low amount or the organic fertilizer in the year it was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–2012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient treatments did not affect marketable yield of muskmelon in KY in the year evaluated.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
nutrient treatmentse1
Outcome
marketable yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
in the year it was evaluatede1
Setting
KYe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“In KY, marketable yield was unaffected by the nutrient treatments in the year it was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2014–2108 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growers who use compost may choose the lower compost rate to minimize production costs.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
lower compost ratee0
Outcome
production costse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“muskmelon growers in PA, IA, and KY who use compost may choose the lower compost rate to minimize production costs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2131–2245 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rowcover-based strategies for organic bacterial wilt management need regional optimization.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Outcome
rowcover-based strategies for organic management of bacterial wilte1
Qualifier
optimized on a regional basise1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“rowcover-based strategies for organic management of bacterial wilt need to be optimized on a regional basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2284–2391 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization with compost is compatible with the rowcover-based strategies.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
fertilization with composte1
Outcome
compatible with these strategiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilization with compost is compatible with these strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2402–2464 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

95 papers: 72 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

insecticide · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.