Paper · 2015 · Current Horticulture

Effect of intercroppings on growth and yield of banana (Musa paradisiaca) cv. Grand Naine under drip irrigation

S J Patil; R B Patel; S. A. Hiray; et al.

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to find out the effect of different intercroppings on growth and yield of banana (Musa paradisiacal L.) cv. Grand Naine at Soil and Water Management Research Farm, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, during 2009–10. The growth parameters, viz. plant height, girth of pseudostem, number of leaves and leaf area of banana reduced due to intercropping 3 and 5 months after planting. However, banana intercropped with onion, garlic and cauliflower showed similar growth to that of sole banana. The days required to inflorescence emergence and harvesting did not influence significantly due to various treatments. The yield and yield attributes also affected due to imposition of intercrops and reduction were increased under cauliflower. However, intercropping remain non-significant for yield attributes, viz. number of hands/bunch, average weight of fingers, number of fingers/bunch, and length and girth of fingers. However, banana + garlic (A2) gave higher yield-attributing characters. Among intercrops, cauliflower caused severe reduction in banana yield under all planting patterns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced banana height, pseudostem girth and leaf number at 3 and 5 months.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
plant height, girth of pseudostem, number of leavese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
3 and 5 months after plantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, girth of pseudostem, number of leaves and leaf area of banana reduced due to intercropping 3 and 5 months after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced banana leaf area at 3 and 5 months.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
3 and 5 months after plantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, girth of pseudostem, number of leaves and leaf area of banana reduced due to intercropping 3 and 5 months after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana intercropped with onion had growth similar to sole banana.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
intercropped with onione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
sole bananae0

Verbatim

e0

“banana intercropped with onion, garlic and cauliflower showed similar growth to that of sole banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana intercropped with garlic had growth similar to sole banana.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
garlice0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
sole bananae0

Verbatim

e0

“banana intercropped with onion, garlic and cauliflower showed similar growth to that of sole banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana intercropped with cauliflower had growth similar to sole banana.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
intercropped with onion, garlic and cauliflowere0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
sole bananae0

Verbatim

e0

“banana intercropped with onion, garlic and cauliflower showed similar growth to that of sole banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrop treatments did not significantly affect time to inflorescence emergence or harvest.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
various treatmentse0
Outcome
days required to inflorescence emergence and harvestinge0
Direction
did not influence significantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The days required to inflorescence emergence and harvesting did not influence significantly due to various treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not significantly affect the listed bunch and finger yield attributes.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
number of hands/bunch, average weight of fingers, number of fingers/bunche0
Direction
non-significante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping remain non-significant for yield attributes, viz. number of hands/bunch, average weight of fingers, number of fingers/bunch, and length and girth of fingers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana with garlic gave higher yield-attributing characters.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
banana + garlic (A2)e0
Outcome
yield-attributing characterse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“banana + garlic (A2) gave higher yield-attributing characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cauliflower intercropping severely reduced banana yield under all planting patterns.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
cauliflowere0
Outcome
banana yielde0
Direction
severe reductione0
Qualifier
all planting patternse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cauliflower caused severe reduction in banana yield under all planting patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1118 · show in text ↑

Allium cepa · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Onion as intercrop produced higher banana growth attributes than cauliflower.

    Intercropping Options in Autumn Planted Banana · 2014 · compared with cauliflower as intercrop

    No difference from an alternative

See all 2 papers →

Allium sativum · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Garlic as intercrop produced higher banana growth attributes than cauliflower.

    Intercropping Options in Autumn Planted Banana · 2014 · compared with cauliflower as intercrop

    No difference from an alternative

See all 2 papers →

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.