Paper · 2016 · Crop Science

Sweetpotato Responses to Mid‐ and Late‐Season Soil Moisture Deficits

Bandara Gajanayake; K. Raja Reddy

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
39
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil moisture‐dependent, quantitative information on sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam)] plant processes is vital for crop management and modeling because of the projected shrinking and uneven distributions of rainfall and irrigation water supply due to climate change. This study was conducted to quantify the growth, physiology, biomass, and storage root yield responses of sweetpotato under four evapotranspiration‐based irrigation treatments (100, 60, 40, and 20% ET) in sunlit growth chambers. Irrigation treatments were imposed from 41 to 97 d after transplanting. Midday leaf water potentials (LWP) and soil moisture contents were measured throughout the experiment. Gas exchange and other physiological measurements were recorded during last 3 wk of the experiment. Plant growth and developmental parameters were measured at 97 d after transplanting. The midday LWP was strongly and linearly correlated with soil moisture content showing the interplay between these two processes. Net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (Tr) declined while photosynthetic water‐use efficiency (Pn/Tr) increased with decreasing LWP. Both total chlorophyll content and cell membrane thermostability (CMT) declined linearly with decreasing LWP. Vine length, leaf area, and node number per plant decreased linearly, by 3.2 cm, 96.6 cm 2 , and 0.39 no. plant −1 , respectively, per unit change in ET‐based irrigation. The optimum soil moisture for total plant and storage root dry weights were obtained under the irrigation treatments of 100 and 72% ET, respectively. Biomass partitioning to storage roots declined linearly and leaf and stem portioning increased with increased irrigation. Outcomes of this research will help producers schedule irrigation to maximize yield and researchers to develop sweetpotato crop models.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Midday leaf water potential correlated linearly with soil moisture content.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
soil moisture contente0
Outcome
midday LWPe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The midday LWP was strongly and linearly correlated with soil moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–92 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration declined as leaf water potential decreased.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
decreasing LWPe0
Outcome
Net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (Tr)e0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (Tr) declined while photosynthetic water‐use efficiency (Pn/Tr) increased with decreasing LWP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1167 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–92 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic water-use efficiency increased as leaf water potential decreased.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
decreasing LWPe0
Outcome
photosynthetic water‐use efficiency (Pn/Tr)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic water‐use efficiency (Pn/Tr) increased with decreasing LWP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1167 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–92 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll and membrane thermostability declined linearly with decreasing leaf water potential.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
decreasing LWPe0
Outcome
total chlorophyll content and cell membrane thermostability (CMT)e0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both total chlorophyll content and cell membrane thermostability (CMT) declined linearly with decreasing LWP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1277 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vine length decreased by 3.2 cm per unit change in ET-based irrigation.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
ET‐based irrigatione0
Outcome
Vine lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3.2 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vine length, leaf area, and node number per plant decreased linearly, by 3.2 cm, 96.6 cm 2 , and 0.39 no. plant −1 , respectively, per unit change in ET‐based irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1448 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area decreased by 96.6 cm 2 per unit change in ET-based irrigation.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
ET‐based irrigatione0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
96.6 cm 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vine length, leaf area, and node number per plant decreased linearly, by 3.2 cm, 96.6 cm 2 , and 0.39 no. plant −1 , respectively, per unit change in ET‐based irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1448 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Node number decreased by 0.39 no. plant −1 per unit change in ET-based irrigation.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
ET‐based irrigatione0
Outcome
node number per plante0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.39 no. plant −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vine length, leaf area, and node number per plant decreased linearly, by 3.2 cm, 96.6 cm 2 , and 0.39 no. plant −1 , respectively, per unit change in ET‐based irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1448 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total plant dry weight was optimal under 100% ET irrigation.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
100e0
Outcome
total plante0
Direction
optimume0
Value
100e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum soil moisture for total plant and storage root dry weights were obtained under the irrigation treatments of 100 and 72% ET, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1598 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage root dry weight was optimal under 72% ET irrigation.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
72% ETe0
Outcome
storage root dry weightse0
Direction
optimume0
Value
72% ETe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum soil moisture for total plant and storage root dry weights were obtained under the irrigation treatments of 100 and 72% ET, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1598 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–92 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage-root biomass partitioning declined as irrigation increased.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
increased irrigatione0
Outcome
Biomass partitioning to storage rootse0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass partitioning to storage roots declined linearly and leaf and stem portioning increased with increased irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1720 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–92 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and stem biomass partitioning increased as irrigation increased.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
increased irrigatione0
Outcome
leaf and stem portioninge0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass partitioning to storage roots declined linearly and leaf and stem portioning increased with increased irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1720 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–92 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.