Paper · 2015 · Scientific Papers - Series A, Agronomy

INFLUENCE OF LIMING WITH Ca(OH)2 ON THE CALCIUM AND MAGNESIUM CONTENT IN THE GRAPE OF WINE GRAPE VARIETIES

Mladen Almaliev; K. Trendafilov; S. Todorova

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In condition of combined field experiment was studied the influence of liming with Ca(OH)2 at rates of 1.0, 2.5 and 5.0 t/ha on the input of calcium and magnesium in the grapes of fertility vines from varieties Sauvignon Blanc, Chardonnay, Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot planted on Chromic luvisol. Samples were collected in two consecutive years. In the first year of the study was not found statistically proven variation of the Ca content in the composition of the fresh grape mass. The available Ca amount in grapes in ameliorative lime rate of 5.0 t/ha was lower compared to that what was found for the lower ameliorative lime doses. About magnesium was found statistically proven exceed at the variants with liming, compared to the variants without liming. Overall white varieties during the first year assimilated more Ca amount compared to the red varieties. According to Mg this difference was insignificant. The differences between limed varieties and the control variant in the second year of the study according to the Ca content in the grape were statistically proven at level of probability 95%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

First year grape calcium content did not vary significantly with liming.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Treatment
LIMING WITH Ca(OH)2t1
Outcome
Ca contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“THE GRAPE OF WINE GRAPE VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the first year of the study was not found statistically proven variation of the Ca content in the composition of the fresh grape mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–484 · show in text ↑
t1

“LIMING WITH Ca(OH)2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape calcium at 5.0 t/ha lime was lower than at lower lime rates.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
lime rate of 5.0 t/hae0
Outcome
Ca amounte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
lower ameliorative lime dosese0

Verbatim

e0

“The available Ca amount in grapes in ameliorative lime rate of 5.0 t/ha was lower compared to that what was found for the lower ameliorative lime doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming significantly increased grape magnesium relative to no liming.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Treatment
liminge0
Outcome
magnesiume0
Direction
exceede0
Comparator
variants without liminge0

Verbatim

t0

“THE GRAPE OF WINE GRAPE VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“About magnesium was found statistically proven exceed at the variants with liming, compared to the variants without liming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–761 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White grape varieties accumulated more calcium than red varieties in the first year.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Material
white varietiese0
Outcome
Ca amounte0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
red varietiese0

Verbatim

t0

“THE GRAPE OF WINE GRAPE VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Overall white varieties during the first year assimilated more Ca amount compared to the red varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–865 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The white versus red variety difference in magnesium was insignificant.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Material
white varietiese1
Outcome
Mge0
Comparator
red varietiese1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“THE GRAPE OF WINE GRAPE VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“According to Mg this difference was insignificant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“Overall white varieties during the first year assimilated more Ca amount compared to the red varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Second year grape calcium content differed significantly between limed and control plants.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
limed varietiese0
Outcome
Ca contente0
Value
95%e0
Comparator
control variante0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The differences between limed varieties and the control variant in the second year of the study according to the Ca content in the grape were statistically proven at level of probability 95%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1108 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.