Paper · 1989 · Weed Science

Control ofCruciferaeWeeds in Canola (Brassica napus) with DPX A7881

Robert E. Blackshaw

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Postemergence control of broadleaf weeds in canola with DPX A7881 was studied under controlled-environment and field conditions. DPX A7881 controlled weeds of the Cruciferae family such as wild mustard, field pennycress, and flixweed, which are not controlled with existing herbicides used for weed control in canola. Weed control was better when DPX A7881 was applied at the two-leaf than at the six-leaf stage of the weeds. At the two-leaf stage, control of flixweed was achieved with 15 g ai/ha of DPX A7881; 20 to 30 g ai/ha was required for control of wild mustard and field pennycress. Control of redroot pigweed required 30 g ai/ha. Common lambsquarters was not controlled in this study with DPX A7881 up to 60 g ai/ha. Control of weeds with DPX A7881 increased canola yields in this study without altering the important quality components: oil content, 1000-kernel weight, and green seed content. DPX A7881 provides a postemergence alternative to existing herbicides for broadleaf weed control in canola.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPX A7881 controlled wild mustard in canola.

Treatment
DPX A7881e0
Interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
wild mustarde0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DPX A7881 controlled weeds of the Cruciferae family such as wild mustard, field pennycress, and flixweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPX A7881 controlled field pennycress in canola.

Treatment
DPX A7881e0
Interactor
field pennycressThlaspi arvensee0weed
Outcome
field pennycresse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thlaspi arvense
Thlaspi arvense · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DPX A7881 controlled weeds of the Cruciferae family such as wild mustard, field pennycress, and flixweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPX A7881 controlled flixweed in canola.

Treatment
DPX A7881e0
Interactor
flixweede0weed
Outcome
flixweede0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DPX A7881 controlled weeds of the Cruciferae family such as wild mustard, field pennycress, and flixweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control was better when DPX A7881 was applied at the two-leaf stage than at six leaves.

Organ / stage
two-leafe0
Treatment
DPX A7881e0
Outcome
Weed controle0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
six-leaf stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control was better when DPX A7881 was applied at the two-leaf than at the six-leaf stage of the weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of flixweed required 15 g ai/ha of DPX A7881.

Treatment
DPX A7881e0
Interactor
flixweede0weed
Outcome
flixweede0
Value
15 g ai/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the two-leaf stage, control of flixweed was achieved with 15 g ai/ha of DPX A7881”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of wild mustard required 20 to 30 g ai/ha of DPX A7881.

Interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
wild mustarde0
Value
20 to 30 g ai/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“20 to 30 g ai/ha was required for control of wild mustard and field pennycress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of field pennycress required 20 to 30 g ai/ha of DPX A7881.

Interactor
field pennycressThlaspi arvensee0weed
Outcome
field pennycresse0
Value
20 to 30 g ai/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thlaspi arvense
Thlaspi arvense · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“20 to 30 g ai/ha was required for control of wild mustard and field pennycress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of redroot pigweed required 30 g ai/ha of DPX A7881.

Interactor
redroot pigweede0weed
Outcome
redroot pigweede0
Value
30 g ai/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of redroot pigweed required 30 g ai/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common lambsquarters was not controlled with DPX A7881 up to 60 g ai/ha.

Treatment
DPX A7881 up to 60 g ai/hae0
Interactor
Common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
Common lambsquarterse0
Direction
not controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common lambsquarters was not controlled in this study with DPX A7881 up to 60 g ai/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control with DPX A7881 increased canola yields.

Treatment
DPX A7881e0
Outcome
canola yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of weeds with DPX A7881 increased canola yields in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPX A7881 did not alter canola oil content.

Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
without alteringe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without altering the important quality components: oil content, 1000-kernel weight, and green seed content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPX A7881 did not alter canola 1000-kernel weight.

Outcome
1000-kernel weighte0
Direction
without alteringe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without altering the important quality components: oil content, 1000-kernel weight, and green seed content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPX A7881 did not alter canola green seed content.

Outcome
green seed contente0
Direction
without alteringe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without altering the important quality components: oil content, 1000-kernel weight, and green seed content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–52 · show in text ↑

ethametsulfuron-methyl · Chenopodium album · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

ethametsulfuron-methyl · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.